02909oam 2200613Ia 450 991069770040332120080930142128.0(CKB)5470000002389954(OCoLC)234524553(EXLCZ)99547000000238995420080722d2008 ua 0engurmn|||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe evaluation of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration[electronic resource] findings and lessons on implementation /[Christy A. Visher, Lisa C. Newmark, and Adele V. Harrell]Washington, DC :U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice,2008.ii, 20 pages digital, PDF fileResearch for Practice"NCJ 219077.""Jun. 08."Title from title screen (viewed Jul. 22, 2008).Includes bibliographical references (pages 19-20)."This Research for Practice report is the second in a series of reports about the experiences of the JOD sites in implementing the demonstration. It begins with a general description of JOD operations at the three study sites. This report then presents findings from a process evaluation of the three JOD sites (that is, an evaluation of the processes used at the sites), and concludes with lessons learned about implementing JOD and similar initiatives."Evaluation of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration Family violenceUnited StatesPreventionEvaluationMarital violenceUnited StatesPreventionEvaluationDating violenceUnited StatesPreventionEvaluationCriminal justice, Administration ofMassachusettsDorchester (Boston)Criminal justice, Administration ofWisconsinMilwaukeeCriminal justice, Administration ofMichiganWashtenaw CountyJudicial errorUnited StatesPreventionFamily violencePreventionEvaluation.Marital violencePreventionEvaluation.Dating violencePreventionEvaluation.Criminal justice, Administration ofCriminal justice, Administration ofCriminal justice, Administration ofJudicial errorPrevention.Visher Christy Ann1414793Newmark Lisa1414794Harrell Adele1405113National Institute of Justice (U.S.)United States.Office of Justice Programs.GULGULGULLEGALGPOBOOK9910697700403321The evaluation of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration3515101UNINA