00848nam0-22003011i-450 99000162738040332120190529131328.0000162738FED01000162738(Aleph)000162738FED0100016273820030910d1934----km-y0itay50------baeng<<A >>bibliography of indium1863-1933Herbert A. Potratz, John R. EkeleyBoulderUniversity of Colorado1934187 p.25 cmBibliografiaIndio016.546 677Ekeley,John R.353237Potratz,Herbert A.69554ITUNINARICAUNIMARCLG99000162738040332160 OP. 3/2431937FAGBCFAGBCBibliography of indium366695UNINA03851nam 22006495 450 991067243950332120251008131339.09783031227431(electronic bk.)978303122742410.1007/978-3-031-22743-1(MiAaPQ)EBC7204041(Au-PeEL)EBL7204041(CKB)26161994200041(DE-He213)978-3-031-22743-1(EXLCZ)992616199420004120230214d2023 u| 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierRelational Liberalism Democratic Co-Authorship in a Pluralistic World /by Federica Liveriero1st ed. 2023.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2023.1 online resource (301 pages)Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations,2352-8389 ;24Print version: Liveriero, Federica Relational Liberalism Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2023 9783031227424 Introduction -- Political Legitimacy Under Epistemic Constraints -- An Epistemic Reading of the Ideal of Co-Authorship -- Justification Under Nonideal Circumstances: Reflective Agreement and Relational Liberalism -- The Ideal of Public Justification Revisited -- Compromises for a Pluralistic World -- A Case Study: Extending Marriage Rights to Same-Sex Couples -- Conclusion.This book investigates the unresolved issue of democratic legitimacy in contexts of pervasive disagreement and contributes to this debate by defending a relational version of political liberalism that rests on the ideal of co-authorship. According to this proposal, democratic legitimacy depends upon establishing appropriate interactions among citizens who ought to ascribe to one another the status of putative practical and epistemic authorities. To support this relational reading of political liberalism, the book proposes a revised account of the civic virtue of reasonableness along with an investigation of the epistemic-specific dimension of political equality. By engaging with political epistemology and social theory, this book explores ways to address inherent tensions within the liberal paradigm, using the following strategies of addressing these tensions: first, it defends a twofold model of legitimacy that distinguishes the goals, methodologies, and justificatory tasks of both ideal and nonideal phases of the two-level justificatory framework; second, it contends that democratic legitimacy requires an engaged and contextual critical appraisal of the injustices that characterize our daily social lives, illustrating how structural forms of injustice represent a profound betrayal of the liberal ideal of democratic legitimacy.Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations,2352-8389 ;24Political sciencePhilosophyPolitical scienceSocial sciencesPhilosophyLawPhilosophyPolitical PhilosophyPolitical ScienceSocial PhilosophyPolitical TheoryPhilosophy of LawPolitical sciencePhilosophy.Political science.Social sciencesPhilosophy.LawPhilosophy.Political Philosophy.Political Science.Social Philosophy.Political Theory.Philosophy of Law.321.8321.801Liveriero Federica 1334087MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQ9910672439503321Relational Liberalism3044716UNINA