04900nam 22007335 450 991064589060332120230810180325.09783031165566(electronic bk.)978303116555910.1007/978-3-031-16556-6(MiAaPQ)EBC7186244(Au-PeEL)EBL7186244(CKB)26050281100041(DE-He213)978-3-031-16556-6(PPN)267809921(EXLCZ)992605028110004120230123d2023 u| 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierNe bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems A Case Law Study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU /by Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas1st ed. 2023.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2023.1 online resource (221 pages)Legal Studies in International, European and Comparative Criminal Law,2524-8057 ;8Print version: Escobar Veas, Javier Ignacio Ne Bis in Idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2023 9783031165559 Introduction -- FIRST PART -- INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE CASE LAW REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of the United States -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of Canada -- Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights -- Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union -- SECOND PART -- CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CASE LAW OF THE ECtHR AND THE CJEU REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Lawfulness of Multiple Sanctioning Systems under the Ne Bis in Idem: Four Different Approaches to Resolve the Same Problem -- THIRD PART -- RECONCEPTUALIZING THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PUNISHMENTS AND THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PROSECUTIONS -- Understanding Multiple Sanctioning Systems: Models of Organisation -- Overcoming the Dead End of the Thesis of the Criminal Nature -- Reconceptualizing the Ne Bis in Idem -- FOURTH PART -- LOOKING BEYOND THE NE BIS IN IDEM: RECALLING THE PROHIBITION OF DISPROPORTIONATE SANCTIONS AND THE RIGHT TO BE TRIED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME -- Looking Beyond the Ne Bis in Idem -- Final Remarks.The aim of the book is to resolve the question of whether multiple sanctioning systems are contrary to the ne bis in idem under the regulation provided by Protocol 7 to the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The first part is a comparative study regarding the lawfulness of multiple sanctioning systems under the ne bis in idem, studying the evolution and the current state of the case law of the United States Supreme Court, the Canadian Supreme Court, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The second part of the book critically analyses three problems with the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU. Part three deals with reconceptualizing the prohibition of multiple punishment and the prohibition of multiple prosecutions. Finally, the fourth part addresses other possible protections against multiple sanctioning systems. Two other safeguards that limit multiple sanctioning systems are the prohibition of disproportionate sanctions and the right to be tried within a reasonable time.Legal Studies in International, European and Comparative Criminal Law,2524-8057 ;8Private international lawConflict of lawsInternational lawComparative lawInternational criminal lawHuman rightsLawEuropeCriminal lawInternational unificationPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative LawInternational Criminal LawHuman RightsEuropean Criminal LawPrivate international law.Conflict of laws.International law.Comparative law.International criminal law.Human rights.LawEurope.Criminal lawInternational unification.Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law.International Criminal Law.Human Rights.European Criminal Law.345.5404345.2404Escobar Veas Javier Ignacio 1275742MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQ9910645890603321Ne Bis in Idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems3006306UNINA