04010nam 2201057z- 450 991063999950332120231214133510.03-0365-6075-0(CKB)5470000001633357(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/95872(EXLCZ)99547000000163335720202301d2022 |y 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierEnergy Supplies in the Countries from the Visegrad GroupBaselMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute20221 electronic resource (252 p.)3-0365-6076-9 The purpose of this Special Issue was to collect and present research results and experiences on energy supply in the Visegrad Group countries. This research considers both macroeconomic and microeconomic aspects. It was important to determine how the V4 countries deal with energy management, how they have undergone or are undergoing energy transformation and in what direction they are heading. The articles concerned aspects of the energy balance in the V4 countries compared to the EU, including the production of renewable energy, as well as changes in its individual sectors (transport and food production). The energy efficiency of low-emission vehicles in public transport and goods deliveries are also discussed, as well as the energy efficiency of farms and energy storage facilities and the impact of the energy sector on the quality of the environment.Research & information: generalbicsscPhysicsbicsscenergy suppliesenergy securityenergy marketEU countriesHellwig’s methodsustainability strategiessustainable developmentVisegrád Groupsustainable strategic managementthe renewable energy sectorenergy usestructuresfood production systemsVisegrad Groupenergy mixrenewablesenergy in transportenergetic efficiencyenergy sourceseconomic growthdeveloping and developed countriesenergy sectorenvironmental qualityrenewable energy sources (RES)nuclear energysoutheastern Polandsustainabilityrenewable energy sourcesEuropean Unioncluster analysisVisegrad Group countriesfuelscointegrationGranger causalityelectricity priceshouseholdsdirections of price changesbiogas energysolar energyhybrid biogas plantrenewable energycircular economyoff-grid systemsenergy efficiencysocial and economic aspects of energyeconomic efficiencylow emissionszero emissionse-commercelast mileparcel lockersefficiency of logistics processeseconomies of scalesimulation of logistics processesCOVID-19BESS managementprice arbitrationshift loadmicrogridResearch & information: generalPhysicsRokicki Tomaszedt1280943Rokicki TomaszothBOOK9910639999503321Energy Supplies in the Countries from the Visegrad Group3017725UNINA03770nam 22008172 450 991077915320332120151005020624.01-107-38680-21-107-23103-51-280-66413-497866136410691-139-37884-81-139-09400-91-139-37598-91-139-37741-81-139-37199-11-139-38027-3(CKB)2550000000103524(EBL)880755(OCoLC)794327755(SSID)ssj0000656508(PQKBManifestationID)11384791(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000656508(PQKBWorkID)10632142(PQKB)10753556(UkCbUP)CR9781139094009(Au-PeEL)EBL880755(CaPaEBR)ebr10565083(CaONFJC)MIL364106(MiAaPQ)EBC880755(EXLCZ)99255000000010352420141103d2012|||| uy| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierIdeology in America /Christopher Ellis, James A. Stimson[electronic resource]Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2012.1 online resource (xviii, 206 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).1-107-68741-1 1-107-01903-6 Includes bibliographical references and index.1. The meaning of ideology in America -- 2. Operational ideology: preferences data -- 3. Operational ideology: the estimates -- 4. Ideological self-identification -- 5. The operational-symbolic disconnect -- 6. Conservatism as social and religious identity -- 7. Conflicted conservatism -- 8. Ideology and American political outcomes.Public opinion in the United States contains a paradox. The American public is symbolically conservative: it cherishes the symbols of conservatism and is more likely to identify as conservative than as liberal. Yet at the same time, it is operationally liberal, wanting government to do and spend more to solve a variety of social problems. This book focuses on understanding this contradiction. It argues that both facets of public opinion are real and lasting, not artifacts of the survey context or isolated to particular points in time. By exploring the ideological attitudes of the American public as a whole, and the seemingly conflicted choices of individual citizens, it explains the foundations of this paradox. The keys to understanding this large-scale contradiction, and to thinking about its consequences, are found in Americans' attitudes with respect to religion and culture and in the frames in which elite actors describe policy issues.IdeologyUnited StatesConservatismUnited StatesLiberalismUnited StatesSocial conflictUnited StatesDivided governmentUnited StatesPublic opinionUnited StatesAmericansAttitudesUnited StatesPolitics and governmentPublic opinionIdeologyConservatismLiberalismSocial conflictDivided governmentPublic opinionAmericansAttitudes.320.50973POL040000bisacshEllis Christopher1978-891513Stimson James A.UkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910779153203321Ideology in America3704455UNINA