01405nam--2200409---450-99000095904020331620100111180820.088-324-9286-50095904USA010095904(ALEPH)000095904USA01009590420020213d1989----km-y0itay0103----baitaIT||||||||001yy<<Il>> contenzioso negli appaltil'equo compensole tre condizioni di applicabilità dell'art. 1664, 2° comma, c.c.giurisprudenza di cassazione e di meritoFrancesco TerranovaMilanoPirola1989389 p24 cmPirola edilizia e urbanistica232001Pirola edilizia e urbanistica23Contratti di appaltoNatura giuridicaAppaltiContenzioso346.4502TERRANOVA,Francesco333803ITsalbcISBD990000959040203316XXIV.3. Coll. 17/ 13 (COLL. HOC 23)65756 ECXXIV.3. Coll. 17/ 13 (COLL. HOC)00263981BKGIUPATTY9020020213USA011446PATTY9020020325USA01132120020403USA011738PATRY9020040406USA011706RSIAV39020100111USA011808Contenzioso negli appalti742751UNISA03492nam 22005653 450 991058022360332120250506080452.03-03928-315-4(CKB)5580000000342261(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/87557(MiAaPQ)EBC31982632(Au-PeEL)EBL31982632(EXLCZ)99558000000034226120250506d2020 uy 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierJudging Research1st ed.Basel :MDPI AG,2020.©2020.1 electronic resource (64 p.)The MDPI Writing Prize Series3-03928-314-6 Intro -- The MDPI Writing Prize Series Volume 2 -- Contents -- List of Contributors -- About the Series Editor -- Preface to "Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded?" -- Incentives, Rewards, and Recognition - What Really Motivates a Researcher? -- How to Evaluate and Reward Science and Technology Researchers -- Scientific Metrics: How Useful Are They? -- Tangible and Non-Tangible Rewards- a Balancing Act -- Judging and Rewarding Research and Researchers: Beyond Bibliometrics -- Judging Research in the Doors of Irreproducibility Crisis Era -- Should the Quality of the Journal Determine the Quality of the Research? -- Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded? -- Open Science, Sustainability and Qualitative Assessment of Merit for an Objective Evaluation of Research -- Impact Factor ≠ Impact: Lessons Learned from Research Evaluation -- Moving Beyond Metrics -- Mathematics in Current Science and in Scientific Evaluation -- Achievement of the Paper and Its Honor for a Researcher -- Judging Research: Is There Even a Need of Evaluating the Research? -- Research Quality and How to Find It? -- Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded? -- Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded?.The 2019 MPDI Writing Prize invited early stage researchers who are not native English speakers to write on the subject of "how research should be evaluated and how researchers should be rewarded". Six prizes were awarded, however there were many more entries. This book collates many of those entries and contains inspiring, thought-provoking and original viewpoints of open science through the eyes of those conducting research on a daily basis.The MDPI Writing Prize SeriesJudging Research Society & culture: generalbicsscopen research; early career researchers; open science; open access; open dataSociety & culture: generalRittman Martyn1318459Nilsson Nils A49584Zhang Qi383798Ogashawara Igor1817434Sivapragasam Magaret1817435Sharma Arvind562116Flores-Guerrero José1817436Yüksek Ahmet1817437Bihorac Ajna1817438Gualtierotti Roberta1817439MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910580223603321Judging Research4375206UNINA