00873nam0 2200277 450 00000965920080410125630.00-387-90101-93-540-90101-920080410d1974----km-y0itay50------baengUSy-------001yyLinear multivariable systemsW. A. WolovichNew YorkHeidelbergBerlinSpringer-VerlagVIII, 358 p.ill.26 cmApplied mathematical sciences00112001Applied mathematical sciences0011Analisi dei sistemi510.819MatematicaWolovich,William A.535936ITUNIPARTHENOPE20080410RICAUNIMARC000009659AMS 510/1122284NAVA120080410Linear multivariable systems925608UNIPARTHENOPE03523oam 2200469 450 991057869960332120231030224510.09783030937294(electronic bk.)3030937291(electronic bk.)97830309372873030937283(MiAaPQ)EBC7018950(Au-PeEL)EBL7018950(CKB)23899476700041EBL7018950(AU-PeEL)EBL7018950(EXLCZ)992389947670004120221223d2022 uy 0engurcz#---auuuutxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierChallenging a fictitious neutrality Heidegger in question /edited by Luce IrigarayCham, Switzerland :Palgrave Macmillan,[2022]©20221 online resource (233 pages)Includes index.Print version: Irigaray, Luce Challenging a Fictitious Neutrality Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2022 9783030937287 Includes index.Introduction: Heidegger as an Exemplary Case -- The Destitution of Dasein -- Against Neut(e)rality -- Heidegger Without Limits -- The Appropriation of Being -- By Way of Epilogue: The Historical Task of Thinking.Why broach and challenge the question of neutrality? For some urgent reasons. The neuter is generally considered to be the condition of objectivity. However, historically, this is asserted by a subject which is masculine and not neuter. Claiming that truth and the way of reaching it are and must be in the neuter amounts to a misuse of power and a falsification of the real. Living beings are not naturally neuter; they are sexuate somehow or other. Subjecting them to the neuter as a condition of their objective status transforms living beings into cultural products deprived of their own origin and dynamism, and builds a world in which the development and the sharing of life are impossible. In this book, four contributors explore this basic mistake of our culture starting from the work of Heidegger and his insistence on maintaining that our being in the world - our Dasein - must be in the neuter. They question the nature of the truth which is then at stake and the political mistakes that it can cause. It is not here a question of sexuality strictly speaking nor of sexual choice. The concern of the two men and the two women who participate in this volume is with the sexuate determination of all living beings. Is not Heidegger's Dasein, as neutered and supposedly neutral, a kind of technical device which prevents living beings from entering into presence? If so, where might that ultimately lead? Luce Irigaray is a retired director of research in philosophy at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (C.N.R.S.), Paris. She has doctorates in philosophy (1974), in linguistics (1968) and in philosophy and literature (1955). She is also trained in psychoanalysis and in yoga. She is a regular reader of the work of Heidegger, to whom she has devoted a book L' oubli de l'air (1983, translated as The Forgetting of Air, 1999) and to whom she refers in many of her publications.OntologyOntology.851.1Irigaray LuceMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQ9910578699603321Challenging a Fictitious Neutrality2898422UNINA