02049nam 2200457z- 450 991055755380332120230221121805.0(CKB)5400000000044068(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/78375(EXLCZ)99540000000004406820202202d2002 |y 0caturmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierMemòria de la transició a Espanya i a Catalunya IIILa reforma de l'exèrcit i de l'administració localPublicacions i Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona20021 electronic resource (299 p.)84-9168-708-4 Aquest tercer volum mostra les intervencions, i alguna vegada també el debat, que van tenir lloc entre els mesos de febrer i abril de l'any 2001 a la Universitat de Barcelona. Es tracta del curs de lliure elecció que, sobre el tema «La reforma de l'exèrcit i de l'administració local», es va celebrar a la seu del Centre d'Estudis Històrics Internacionals del Pavelló de la República, així com al Seminari d'Història de Barcelona de l'Ajuntament de Barcelona.Memòria de la transició a Espanya i a Catalunya III Memòria de la transició a Espanya i a Catalunya III HistorybicsscSociety & culture: generalbicsscSociology & anthropologybicsscTransició democràtica espanyola, 1975-1982ExèrcitsAdministració localCatalunyaEspanyaHistorySociety & culture: generalSociology & anthropologyAracil Rafaelauth1282508Segura AntoniauthMayayo i Artal AndreuauthBOOK9910557553803321Memòria de la transició a Espanya i a Catalunya III3033252UNINA04064nam 2200637 a 450 991078615390332120230803025317.00-674-07042-90-674-06796-710.4159/harvard.9780674067967(CKB)2670000000330040(StDuBDS)AH25018200(SSID)ssj0000783256(PQKBManifestationID)11416542(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000783256(PQKBWorkID)10752106(PQKB)11066499(MiAaPQ)EBC3301177(DE-B1597)178013(OCoLC)1004875437(OCoLC)819323260(OCoLC)840440989(DE-B1597)9780674067967(Au-PeEL)EBL3301177(CaPaEBR)ebr10640099(OCoLC)923119104(EXLCZ)99267000000033004020120411d2013 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtccrThe fallacies of states' rights[electronic resource] /Sotirios A. BarberCambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press20131 online resource (245 pages) Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-674-06667-7 Includes bibliographical references and index.Introduction: America's oldest constitutional debate -- Why the states can't check national power -- John Marshall and a constitution for national security and prosperity -- The implications of Marshallian federalism -- Why states' rights federalism is impossible to defend -- John C. Calhoun's false theory of the Union -- States' rights as rights only to participate in national processes -- Why Marshallians should (but may not) win the states' rights debate.The idea that "states' rights" restrain national power is riding high in American judicial and popular opinion. Here, Sotirios A. Barber shows how arguments for states' rights, from the days of John C. Calhoun to the present, have offended common sense, logic, and bedrock constitutional principles. To begin with, states' rights federalism cannot possibly win the debate with national federalism owing to the very forum in which the requisite argument must occur-a national one, thanks to the Civil War-and the ordinary rules of practical argumentation. Further, the political consequences of this self-defeating logic can only hasten the loss of American sovereignty to international economic forces. Both philosophical and practical reasons compel us to consider two historical alternatives to states' rights federalism. In the federalism of John Marshall, the nation's most renowned jurist, the national government's duty to ensure security, prosperity, and other legitimate national ends must take precedence over all conflicting exercises of state power. In "process" federalism, the Constitution protects the states by securing their roles in national policy making and other national decisions. Barber opts for Marshall's federalism, but the contest is close, and his analysis takes the debate into new, fertile territory. Affirming the fundamental importance of the Preamble, Barber advocates a conception of the Constitution as a charter of positive benefits for the nation. It is not, in his view, a contract among weak separate sovereigns whose primary function is to protect people from the central government, when there are greater dangers to confront. Federal governmentUnited StatesStates' rights (American politics)United StatesPolitics and governmentPhilosophyFederal governmentStates' rights (American politics)320.473/049MG 70000BVBrvkBarber Sotirios A595672MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910786153903321The fallacies of states' rights3847499UNINA