03777oam 2200493I 450 991016487100332120230809222745.00-367-18107-X1-315-27103-61-351-98385-710.4324/9781315271033 (CKB)3710000001060449(MiAaPQ)EBC4809843(OCoLC)973223067(EXLCZ)99371000000106044920180706d2017 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierByzantium and the emergence of Muslim-Turkish Anatolia, ca. 1040-1130 /Alexander Daniel BeihammerLondon ;New York, N.Y. :Routledge,2017.1 online resource (458 pages) illustrations, mapsBirmingham Byzantine and Ottoman Studies1-138-22959-8 1-351-98386-5 Includes bibliographical references and index.First encounters in Byzantium's eastern marches, ca. 1040-1071 -- The eastern provinces, Turkish migrations, and the Seljuk imperial project -- Byzantine-Seljuk diplomacy and the first Turkish footholds -- Emperor Romanos IV and Sultan Alp Arslan, 1068-1071 -- Decay of imperial authority and regionalization of power, 1071-1096 -- Sulayman b. Qutlumush and the first Turkish lordships in Syria -- Revolts and Byzantine-Turkish coalitions in Asia Minor, 1071-1081 -- Seljuk rule between centralization and disintegration, 1086-1098 -- Turkish and Byzantine-Armenian lordships in Asia Minor -- The Crusades and the crystallization of Muslim Anatolia, 1096-ca. 1130 -- Seljuk reactions to the First Crusade -- New contact and conflict zones.The arrival of the Seljuk Turks in Anatolia forms an indispensable part of modern Turkish discourse on national identity, but Western scholars, by contrast, have rarely included the Anatolian Turks in their discussions about the formation of European nations or the transformation of the Near East. The Turkish penetration of Byzantine Asia Minor is primarily conceived of as a conflict between empires, sedentary and nomadic groups, or religious and ethnic entities. This book proposes a new narrative, which begins with the waning influence of Constantinople and Cairo over large parts of Anatolia and the Byzantine-Muslim borderlands, as well as the failure of the nascent Seljuk sultanate to supplant them as a leading supra-regional force. In both Byzantine Anatolia and regions of the Muslim heartlands, local elites and regional powers came to the fore as holders of political authority and rivals in incessant power struggles. Turkish warrior groups quickly assumed a leading role in this process, not because of their raids and conquests, but because of their intrusion into pre-existing social networks. They exploited administrative tools and local resources and thus gained the acceptance of local rulers and their subjects. Nuclei of lordships came into being, which could evolve into larger territorial units. There was no Byzantine decline nor Turkish triumph but, rather, the driving force of change was the successful interaction between these two spheres.Birmingham Byzantine and Ottoman studies.SeljuksByzantine EmpireHistory1025-1081Byzantine EmpireHistoryComneni dynasty, 1081-1185Seljuks.949.5/03Beihammer Alexander Daniel.620841MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910164871003321Byzantium and the emergence of Muslim-Turkish Anatolia, ca. 1040-11302055283UNINA03874nam 2200865z- 450 991055751090332120210501(CKB)5400000000044447(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/68317(oapen)doab68317(EXLCZ)99540000000004444720202105d2021 |y 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierUntargeted Alternative Routes of Arbovirus TransmissionBasel, SwitzerlandMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute20211 online resource (178 p.)3-03943-767-4 3-03943-768-2 Arboviruses have become global threats. Common to Dengue, Zika, yellow fever, chikungunya, and Mayaro viruses is their ability to be transmitted by mosquitoes. Several strategies based on transgenics or microbiology are currently being field-tested. While this approach seems hopeful, the research community needs to focus on potential backlash from these technologies to prevent failure. The aim of the Special Issue is to cover different transmission routes that are untargeted by the newly developed strategies to foresee limitations. Here, Fontenille & Powell gave their insights on how a mosquito species becomes a global vector, Yen & Failloux presented the limitations of Wolbachia-based population replacement, Pereira-dos-Santos et al. reviewed the evidence that Aedes albopictus is an important vector, and Diagne et al. gathered information about the latest emerging arbovirus: Mayaro. Manuel et al. demonstrated that in certain conditions mosquitoes efficiently transmit Zika viruses and Rozo-Lopez et al. showed that midges vertically transmit stomatitis virus, highlighting the epidemiological significance of vertical transmission. Vector competence for secondary vectors was improved by Kosoltanapiwat et al. during entomological surveillance and by Fernandes et al. when evaluating different vector species competence for Zika viruses. Morales-Vargas et al. and Calvez et al. improved our understanding of DENV2 and DENV4 epidemiology.Medicine and NursingbicsscAedesAedes aegyptiAedes albopictusAedes vectorsalphavirusarbovirusarbovirusesblood-feedingbridge vectorculicidaeCulicoides midgesdenguedengue virusDENV-4disease severityemergenceemerging arbovirusemerging diseasesenvironmental factorsepidemicLao PDRmating behaviorMayaromosquitomosquito controlmosquito surveillancenon-conventional transmissionphylogenyreplacement strategyreproductive anatomyspill-oversusceptibilityThailandTogaviridaetransmission efficiencyvector capacityvector competencevenereal transmissionvertical transmissionvesicular stomatitis virusviral adaptationWolbachiazika virusZika virusMedicine and NursingPompon Julienedt1293818Pompon JulienothBOOK9910557510903321Untargeted Alternative Routes of Arbovirus Transmission3022744UNINA