06353nam 2201741z- 450 991055741010332120210501(CKB)5400000000043575(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/69185(oapen)doab69185(EXLCZ)99540000000004357520202105d2020 |y 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierOsseointegrated Oral implantsMechanisms of Implant Anchorage, Threats and Long-Term Survival RatesBasel, SwitzerlandMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute20201 online resource (368 p.)3-03936-640-8 3-03936-641-6 In the past, osseointegration was regarded to be a mode of implant anchorage that simulated a simple wound healing phenomenon. Today, we have evidence that osseointegration is, in fact, a foreign body reaction that involves an immunologically derived bony demarcation of an implant to shield it off from the tissues. Marginal bone resorption around an oral implant cannot be properly understood without realizing the foreign body nature of the implant itself. Whereas the immunological response as such is positive for implant longevity, adverse immunological reactions may cause marginal bone loss in combination with combined factors. Combined factors include the hardware, clinical handling as well as patient characteristics that, even if each one of these factors only produce subliminal trauma, when acting together they may result in loss of marginal bone. The role of bacteria in the process of marginal bone loss is smaller than previously believed due to combined defense mechanisms of inflammation and immunological reactions, but if the defense is failing we may see bacterially induced marginal bone loss as well. However, problems with loss of marginal bone threatening implant survival remains relatively uncommon; we have today 10 years of clinical documentation of five different types of implant displaying a failure rate in the range of only 1 to 4 %.Osseointegrated Oral implants Medicine and Nursingbicsscabutment heightair flowallergy and immunologyalveolar bone lossalveolar bone remodeling/regenerationanchorage techniquearthroplastyaseptic looseningaugmentationbiocompatibilitybiocompositebiofilmbiological widthbiomaterialbiomaterialsbiomechanicsbonebone biologybone chipsbone damagebone healingbone lossbone-implant interfacebone-implant interfacebrain-bone axisCBCT (cone beam computerized tomography)cell adhesioncell plasticityclassification of bone defectsclinical studycontactconvergenceCrestal bone lossCucytokinesdental implantdental implantationdental implantsdiagnosisdog studydrilling tool designearly losselectrolytic cleaningelectron microscopyenergy-dispersive X-ray spectrometryepigenomicsfinite element analysis (FEA)finite element modelforeign body reactionfused deposition modelinghealingheathiphistologyhypersensitivityiatrogenic damageimmuneimmune systemimmunomodulationimplantimplant contaminationimplant insertion depthimplant installationimplant surfaceimplant survivalin vivo studyinfectioninsertionInterleukin-8intraosseous temperatureligature induced peri-implantitisligature-induced peri-implantitismarginal bone lossmaterials testingmechanical propertiesmechanotransductionmicro-RNAmicroarraymucositisn/aoral health-related quality of lifeoral implantoral implantsorthopedic implantosseointegrationosseoseparationosseosufficiencyosteogenesisosteotomyover-treatmentoverdentureoverloadingpatient-reported outcome measuresPEEKperi-implant endosseous healingperi-implantitisperiimplantitisperio-prosthetic joint infectionphotoacoustic ultrasoundpolyether ether ketonepredictive biomarkerradiographyre-osseointegrationreplacementscanning electron microscopyscanning transmission electron microscopysoft tissuesplit-mouth designsubcrestal implantssurface propertiessystematic reviewtitaniumtopographyvertical mucosal thicknesswettabilityzirconiaMedicine and NursingAlbrektsson Tomasedt1302073Albrektsson TomasothBOOK9910557410103321Osseointegrated Oral implants3026097UNINA