03600nam 2200517 450 991053943460332120200520144314.090-8952-176-3(CKB)3710000000605350(EBL)4424496(MiAaPQ)EBC4424496(Au-PeEL)EBL4424496(CaPaEBR)ebr11163535(OCoLC)945612026(EXLCZ)99371000000060535020160315h20162016 uy| 0engur|n|---|||||rdacontentrdamediardacarrierNational procedural autonomy revisisted consequences of differences in national administrative litigation rules for the Enforcement of European Union environmental law-- the case of the EIA directive /Dr. Franziska GrashofGroningen :Europe Louisiana Publishing,[2016]©20161 online resource (341 p.)European administrative law series ;10Description based upon print version of record.90-8952-180-1 National Procedural Autonomy Revisited. Consequences of Differences in National Administrative Litigation Rules for the Enforcement of European Union Environmental Law - The Case of the EIA Directive by Dr. Franziska Grashof; Acknowledgements; Contents; Abbreviations; Introduction; Part I. Uniform Rules: The EIA Procedure of the Union; Part II. Fragmented Enforcement: National Rules in EIA Cases; Part III. Beyond National Procedural Autonomy?; Hypothetical Case Study; Bibliography; Online Sources; Table of Cases; Table of Legislation; Curriculum Vitae"In National Procedural Autonomy Revisited, Franziska Grashof reconsiders one of the leading principles of European administrative law: the principle of national procedural autonomy. Her work shows that due to different national administrative litigation rules, common European rules are enforced in a fragmented manner. This is illustrated with the example of the judicial enforcement of Directive 2011/92/EU on environmental impact assessment for projects in the legal systems of Germany, England and the Netherlands. Under the same rule of Union law, litigants are treated procedurally unequally, there are different enforcement chances, and judges come to different conclusions not because of diverging interpretations of the law, but because of different administrative litigation rules. Subsequently, it is discussed whether it is necessary, desirable and possible to develop common rules of administrative litigation (in environmental matters) in the Union. It is argued, that by means of the instruments which are available in the Union - specifically legislation, jurisprudence, and comparative scholarship - a more precise common standard for administrative litigation (in environmental matters) should be created, so that the principle is: ubi ius europaeum, ibi remedium europaeum"--Back cover.European administrative law series ;v. 10.Environmental lawEuropean Union countriesEnvironmental protectionEuropean Union countriesEuropeEuropean Union countriesfastElectronic books.Environmental lawEnvironmental protection344.046Grashof Franziska1182477MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910539434603321National procedural autonomy revisisted2743566UNINA