04502nam 22006611c 450 991046119600332120200115203623.00-567-66073-71-280-57941-297866136091820-567-48497-110.5040/9780567660732(CKB)2670000000178652(EBL)894535(OCoLC)787843483(SSID)ssj0000661928(PQKBManifestationID)11404250(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000661928(PQKBWorkID)10712480(PQKB)10251781(MiAaPQ)EBC894535(Au-PeEL)EBL894535(CaPaEBR)ebr10554651(CaONFJC)MIL360918(OCoLC)1057402194(UtOrBLW)bpp09258284(EXLCZ)99267000000017865220150227d2012 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrDoctrine, dynamic and difference Pieter de WitteLondon New York T&T Clark 2012.1 online resource (273 p.)Ecclesiological investigations v. 15Description based upon print version of record.0-567-31682-3 0-567-23665-X Includes bibliographical references (pages 241-250) and index1. Introduction -- 2. The Joint Declaration on Justification: Basis Issues -- 3. Reception of Theological Advances -- 4. The Reception of Previous Dialogue Results -- 5. The Joint Declaration: A Textual Analysis -- 6. Conclusion"One of the most divisive issues in Western Christianity since the Reformation is the question of how humans are justified by God. In 1999, after many decades of ecumenical dialogue, Lutherans and Roman Catholics have declared that this issue of 'justification by faith' is no longer a cause of division between them. One of the fascinating features of this Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (JDDJ) is that it expresses a 'differentiated consensus' on justification. The method of differentiated consensus is generally regarded as an important methodological step forward in the ecumenical dialogue. It has been used and referred to in ecumenical documents published after 1999. But what are its meaning and implications? This study attempts to clarify the method of differentiated consensus by (1) investigating the process of doctrinal rapprochement which led up to the JDDJ, (2) examining the way the consensus takes shape in the document itself, (3) analyzing arguments offered by critics and advocates of the official dialogue and (4) reflecting on the concept of doctrinal difference."--Bloomsbury PublishingOne of the most divisive issues in Western Christianity since the Reformation is the question of how humans are justified by God. In 1999, after many decades of ecumenical dialogue, Lutherans and Roman Catholics have declared that this issue of 'justification by faith' is no longer a cause of division between them. One of the fascinating features of this Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (JDDJ) is that it expresses a 'differentiated consensus' on justification. The method of differentiated consensus is generally regarded as an important methodological step forward in the ecumenical dialogue. It has been used and referred to in ecumenical documents published after 1999. But what are its meaning and implications? This study attempts to clarify the method of differentiated consensus by (1) investigating the process of doctrinal rapprochement which led up to the JDDJ, (2) examining the way the consensus takes shape in the document itself, (3) analyzing arguments offered by critics and advocates of the official dialogue and (4) reflecting on the concept of doctrinal differenceEcclesiological investigations ;v. 15.Doctrine, dynamic and difference : to the heart of the Lutheran-Roman Catholic differentiated consensus on justificationJustification (Christian theology)Christian Churches & denominationsJustification (Christian theology)234.7Witte Pieter de854638UtOrBLWUtOrBLWUkLoBPBOOK9910461196003321Doctrine, dynamic and difference1908459UNINA04687oam 22007814a 450 991052465840332120210915034013.02-7605-1653-91-4356-9848-7(CKB)1000000000720347(EBL)599886(OCoLC)681484508(SSID)ssj0000734868(PQKBManifestationID)11422721(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000734868(PQKBWorkID)10743571(PQKB)10527770(CaBNvSL)thg00603938 (MiAaPQ)EBC3257321(OCoLC)417070432(MdBmJHUP)muse20975(MiAaPQ)EBC599886(Au-PeEL)EBL599886(CaPaEBR)ebr11337218(CaONFJC)MIL936206(PPN)170240592(FR-PaCSA)88801240(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/gjk30r(schport)gibson_crkn/2009-12-01/7/422419(EXLCZ)99100000000072034720000803d2000 uy 0freur|n|---|||||txtccrL'ère du chiffre / The Age of NumbersSystèmes statistiques et traditions nationales/Statistical Systems and National Traditions /sous la direction de Jean-Pierre Beaud et Jean-Guy Prevost1st ed.Sainte-Foy :Presses de l'Universite du Quebec,2000.©2000.1 online resource (510 p.)L'âge de la démocratiePapers presented at a conference held at the Universite du Quebec à Montreal, Sept. 21-23, 1999.2-7605-1080-8 Includes bibliographical references.L'ÉRE DU CHIFFRE / THE AGE OF NUMBERS; Table des matières; Introduction; Chapitre 1_Systèmes statistiques et traditions nationales / Statistical Systems and National Traditions; Chapitre 2_Façonner les gens: le seuil de pauvreté; Chapitre 3_Histoire de la statistique: styles d'écriture et usages sociaux; Institutions; Chapitre 4_L'expérience statistique canadienne; Chapitre 5_Robert H. Coats, Architect of Canada's National Statistical System; Chapitre 6_Building the American Statistical System in the Long 19th CenturyChapitre 7_Tensions et contradictions du système statistique soviétique: de la Révolution à la Seconde Guerre mondialeChapitre 8_L'INSEE, histoire d'une institution; Chapitre 9_Les réseaux de l'internationalisme statistique (1885-1914); Chapitre 10_La commission de statistique de l'ONU; Chapitre 11_La construction des statistiques sur la science et la technologie; Savoirs et pratiques; Chapitre 12_The Buller Education Commission; or, the London Statistical Society Comes to Canada, 1838-1842; Chapitre 13_Styles of Statistical Reasoning: The French Liberal Tradition ReconsideredChapitre 14_Demography and Official Statistics in Canada. The Case of DemolinguisticsChapitre 15_Le cycle des affaires et la prévision économique; Chapitre 16_Keynes, les probabilités et les statistiques: une relation complexe; Chapitre 17_Méthodes mathématiques et statistiques en économie: nouvelles questions sur d'anciennes querelles; Chapitre 18_Compter et conter: le dire de la statistique; Conclusion; Chapitre 19_Statistics in the History of Social Science; Les auteurs / The authorsQuel effet ont sur nous les classements et mesures statistiques ? Exerçons-nous, en retour, une action sur ces mesures ? C'est en prenant en compte les différences nationales et les barrières entre les diverses disciplines que les auteurs répondent à ces questions. Ils font le point sur l'évolution de la statistique comme mode de connaissance et de gestion du monde social et évaluent les outils mathématiques ou formels qui en constituent le fonds technique, les assises matérielles qui en assurent le déploiement et les demandes d'information qui en légitiment l'existence.Âge de la démocratie.StatisticsCanadaCongressesStatisticsHistoryCongressesStatisticsMethodologyCongressesStatisticsCongressesElectronic books. StatisticsStatisticsHistoryStatisticsMethodologyStatistics519.5Prevost Jean-Guy1955-1115741Beaud Jean-Pierre1950-1141186MdBmJHUPMdBmJHUPBOOK9910524658403321L'ère du chiffre2679417UNINA