04590nam 2200673 a 450 991051150850332120230721003730.00-19-985534-X1-283-11608-197866131160860-19-974508-0(CKB)1000000000557369(EBL)3054173(OCoLC)922970474(SSID)ssj0000086935(PQKBManifestationID)11998504(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000086935(PQKBWorkID)10054795(PQKB)10318564(StDuBDS)EDZ0000073007(MiAaPQ)EBC3054173(MiAaPQ)EBC7036555(Au-PeEL)EBL7036555(EXLCZ)99100000000055736920061129d2007 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrForum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements /Ronald A. Brand, Scott R. JablonskiNew York Oxford University Pressc20071 online resource (359 p.)CILE studies ;v. 3Description based upon print version of record.0-19-532927-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.""TABLE OF CONTENTS""; ""PREFACE""; ""CHAPTER 1: COMMON LAW FORUM NON CONVENIENS: FOUR COUNTRIES, FOUR APPROACHES""; ""CHAPTER 2: THE UNITED KINGDOM""; ""I. Scotland: From forum non competens to most appropriate forum""; ""II. England: From reticence to recognition""; ""A. First steps: the oppressive and vexatious principle""; ""B. The most suitable forum approach""; ""C. Modern forum non conveniens doctrine in England""; ""III. The impact of the Brussels Convention and Regulation""; ""A. The basic framework""; ""B. Owusu v. Jackson""""IV. Current forum non conveniens analysis in the United Kingdom""""CHAPTER 3: THE UNITED STATES""; ""I. Introduction""; ""II. Early development""; ""A. Admiralty roots in the federal courts""; ""B. State courts and constitutional issues""; ""C. Extending the doctrine beyond admiralty cases""; ""III. Modern forum non conveniens doctrine""; ""A. Gilbert and Koster: The foundations of current doctrine""; ""B. Federal transfer rules""; ""C. Jurisdictional developments limiting the need for forum non conveniens""; ""D. Refinement in the Supreme Court: Piper Aircraft""""CHAPTER 5: AUSTRALIA""""I. Between ""vexation and oppression"" and the ""most appropriate forum""""; ""II. The ""clearly inappropriate forum"" test""; ""A. Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Co. Inc. v. Fay""; ""B. Voth v. Manildra Flour Mills Pty. Ltd""; ""C. Dow Jones & Co., Inc. v. Gutnick""; ""III. Internal case allocation: the Cross-Vesting Act""; ""IV. Summary and conclusion""; ""CHAPTER 6: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN COMMON LAW FORUM NON CONVENIENS DOCTRINE""; ""I. Introduction""; ""II. Similarities in forum non conveniens doctrines""""A. The requirement of an available, alternative forum""""B. Allocation of the general burden of proof on the defendant""; ""C. Consideration of private interest factors""; ""D. Trial court discretion in applying forum non conveniens analysis""; ""E. Ability to impose conditions on a stay or dismissal""; ""F. Benefits of existing similarities in comparative analysis""; ""III. Differences in forum non conveniens doctrines""; ""A. Distinctions setting Australia apart""; ""B. Distinctions setting the United States apart""; ""C. Other distinctions""""IV. Conclusions: similarity with distinctions""Giving an in-depth analysis of the doctrine of forum non conveniens as it has evolved, this book focuses on four major common law countries - UK, US, Canada, and Australia. It analyzes the similarities and differences of the doctrine among those four countries, comparing this to analogous laws found in civil law countries.CILE studies ;v. 3.Forum non conveniensConflict of lawsJurisdictionForum non conveniens.Conflict of lawsJurisdiction.347.012Brand Ronald A266532Jablonski Scott R523100University of Pittsburgh.Center for International Legal Education.MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910511508503321Forum non conveniens827986UNINA