00748nam0 2200253 450 00002772020100920111343.0978-88-498-2309-720100827d2008----km-y0itay50------baitaITy-------001yy4. Rapporto sul microcredito in ItaliaC. Borgomeo&coSoveria MannelliRubbettino2008196 p.ill.23 cmMicrocreditoItalia338.521332.7094521C. Borgomeo&co.633907ITUNIPARTHENOPE20100827RICAUNIMARC000027720332-R/1442431NAVA120104. Rapporto sul microcredito in Italia1211382UNIPARTHENOPE02833 am 2200481 n 450 9910495931803321202007212-84867-744-910.4000/books.pufc.8072(CKB)4100000011610403(FrMaCLE)OB-pufc-8072(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/86174(PPN)251071413(EXLCZ)99410000001161040320201126j|||||||| ||| 0freuu||||||m||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierDonner des raisons morales. Problèmes de l’éthique kantienne /Isabelle Pariente-ButterlinBesançon Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté20201 online resource (268 p.) Annales littéraires2-84867-492-X Faut-il ne jamais mentir ? Devons-nous nous interdire le moindre mensonge alors même que cette rigueur morale rendrait bien pénible et bien incertaine la vie en société ? Qu’en est-il, à plus forte raison, si ce sont des assassins qui poursuivent un de nos amis ? Leur devons-nous la vérité ? Comment défendre une thèse aussi absurde ? On attribue souvent cette position morale trop rigoriste au kantisme pratique, et certes, il y a quelques raisons de le faire. Comment dès lors ne pas considérer que le kantisme pratique achoppe sur tous les cas tragiques que l’Histoire a fournis au cours des siècles, et en particulier au xxe siècle ? Le kantisme serait-il donc incapable de penser la complexité de notre monde contemporain ? C’est cette objection factuelle radicale que l’auteur a voulu prendre au sérieux. Cela demandait de repenser, à l’intérieur du kantisme, la possibilité de résoudre des situations dans lesquelles, de manière intuitive, nous aurions tendance à accepter le mensonge. C’est d’ailleurs l’objection que n’a pas manqué de faire à Kant, dès 1797, Benjamin Constant. En repartant de cette polémique, l’auteur fait fonctionner jusqu’à son point limite la position kantienne en morale pour montrer qu’elle est encore capable de nous servir à penser notre monde et qu’elle continue de répondre aux questions que nous nous posons.Philosophyéthiquemoralekantisme pratiqueéthiquemoralekantisme pratiquePhilosophyéthiquemoralekantisme pratiquePariente-Butterlin Isabelle1287481FR-FrMaCLEBOOK9910495931803321Donner des raisons morales. Problèmes de l’éthique kantienne3020172UNINA04283nam 22006855 450 991079366110332120210716003351.00-8232-8437-910.1515/9780823284375(CKB)4100000008527030(MiAaPQ)EBC5802727(DE-B1597)551615(DE-B1597)9780823284375(OCoLC)1103320316(EXLCZ)99410000000852703020200723h20192019 fg 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierAmerican Parishes Remaking Local Catholicism /Gary J. Adler, Tricia C. Bruce, Brian StarksNew York, NY :Fordham University Press,[2019]©20191 online resource (279 pages)Catholic Practice in North AmericaFront matter --Contents --Introduction. What is a parish? why look at catholic parishes? --1. A brief history of the sociology of parishes in the united states --2. Studying parishes lessons and new directions from the study of congregations --3. The shifting landscape of us catholic parishes, 1998–2012 --4. Stable transformation catholic parishioners in the united states --5. Power in the parish --6. Liturgy as identity work in predominantly African American parishes --7. A house divided --8. Parishes as homes and hubs --9. Preparing to say “i do” --10. A sociologist looks at his own parish a conversation with john a. Coleman, SJ --Conclusion. Parishes as the embedded middle of American Catholicism --Acknowledgments --Contributors --IndexParishes are the missing middle in studies of American Catholicism. Between individual Catholics and a global institution, the thousands of local parishes are where Catholicism gets remade. American Parishes showcases what social forces shape parishes, what parishes do, how they do it, and what this says about the future of Catholicism in the United States. Expounding an embedded field approach, this book displays the numerous forces currently reshaping American parishes. It draws from sociology of religion, culture, organizations, and race to illuminate basic parish processes, like leadership and education, and ongoing parish struggles like conflict and multiculturalism. American Parishes brings together contemporary data, methods, and questions to establish a sociological re-engagement with Catholic parishes and a Catholic re-engagement with sociological analysis. Contributions by leading social scientists highlight how community, geography, and authority intersect within parishes. It illuminates and analyzes how growing racial diversity, an aging religious population, and neighborhood change affect the inner workings of parishes. Contributors: Gary J. Adler Jr., Nancy Ammerman, Mary Jo Bane, Tricia C. Bruce, John A. Coleman, S.J., Kathleen Garces-Foley, Mary Gray, Brett Hoover, Courtney Ann Irby, Tia Noelle Pratt, and Brian StarksCatholicsUnited StatesCatholic ChurchUnited StatesCatholicism.Congregations.Field Theory.Organizations.Parish Life.Parish Trends.Parishes.CatholicsCatholic Church282.73Adler Gary J1469951Ammerman Nancy1469952Bane Mary Jo141118Bruce Tricia C1469953Coleman John A142132Garces-Foley Kathleen1131768Gray Mark M1469954Hoover Brett1469955Irby Courtney1469956Pratt Tia Noelle1469957Starks Brian1469958Adler Gary J.edthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtBruce Tricia C.edthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtStarks Brianedthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtDE-B1597DE-B1597BOOK9910793661103321American Parishes3681594UNINA03825nam 2200481z- 450 991022004710332120210211(CKB)3800000000216306(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/47158(oapen)doab47158(EXLCZ)99380000000021630620202102d2016 |y 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe Evolving TelomeresFrontiers Media SA20161 online resource (74 p.)Frontiers Research Topics2-88919-881-2 What controls the different rates of evolution to give rise to conserved and divergent proteins and RNAs? How many trials until evolution can adapt to physiological changes? Every organism has arisen through multiple molecular changes, and the mechanisms that are employed (mutagenesis, recombination, transposition) have been an issue left to the elegant discipline of evolutionary biology. But behind the theory are realities that we have yet to ascertain: How does an evolving cell accommodate its requirements for both conserving its essential functions, while also providing a selective advantage? In this volume, we focus on the evolution of the eukaryotic telomere, the ribo-nuclear protein complex at the end of a linear chromosome. The telomere is an example of a single chromosomal element that must function to maintain genomic stability. The telomeres of all species must provide a means to avoid the attrition from semi-conservative DNA replication and a means of telomere elongation (the telomere replication problem). For example, telomerase is the most well-studied mechanism to circumvent telomere attrition by adding the short repeats that constitutes most telomeres. The telomere must also guard against the multiple activities that can act on an unprotected double strand break requiring a window (or checkpoint) to compensate for telomere sequence loss as well as protection against non-specific processes (the telomere protection problem). This volume describes a range of methodologies including mechanistic studies, phylogenetic comparisons and data-based theoretical approaches to study telomere evolution over a broad spectrum of organisms that includes plants, animals and fungi. In telomeres that are elongated by telomerases, different components have widely different rates of evolution. Telomerases evolved from roots in archaebacteria including splicing factors and LTR-transposition. At the conserved level, the telomere is a rebel among double strand breaks (DSBs) and has altered the function of the highly conserved proteins of the ATM pathway into an elegant means of protecting the chromosome end and maintaining telomere size homeostasis through a competition of positive and negative factors. This homeostasis, coupled with highly conserved capping proteins, is sufficient for protection. However, far more proteins are present at the telomere to provide additional species-specific functions. Do these proteins provide insight into how the cell allows for rapid change without self-destruction?Genetics (non-medical)bicsscArabidopsisCandida SaccharomycesevolutionIncRNAModelparalogretrotransposonst-loopsTelomereTERL proteinsTRF proteinsVertebratesGenetics (non-medical)Kurt Rungeauth510557Arthur J. LustigauthBOOK9910220047103321The Evolving Telomeres3040853UNINA