03186 am 2200661 n 450 9910495767703321201905222-271-12217-110.4000/books.editionscnrs.21066(CKB)4100000009681655(FrMaCLE)OB-editionscnrs-21066(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/84873(PPN)26794392X(EXLCZ)99410000000968165520191029j|||||||| ||| 0freuu||||||m||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierGuerre, armées et communication /Éric LetonturierParis CNRS Éditions20191 online resource (230 p.) Les essentiels d'Hermès2-271-09355-4 Propagande, censure et désinformation d'un côté ; devoir de réserve, secret défense et silence dans les rangs de la « grande muette » d'un autre. Faire la guerre semble condamner la communication des armées à de tels extrêmes. Mais qu'en est-il aujourd'hui, avec l'internet et les réseaux sociaux, l'information continue et les lanceurs d'alerte, et une opinion publique de plus en plus sondée et souveraine ? Parallèlement, la surveillance géopolitique électronique, la numérisation du champ de bataille, l'arrivée des drones, robots et soldats augmentés sur les théâtres d'opérations changent aussi la donne. Reste que la guerre engage toujours et avant tout des relations entre des hommes sur le terrain. Elle est aussi profondément un acte de communication pour être d'abord un dialogue rompu, un affrontement avec l'altérité. Avec, comme horizon, à l'heure de la montée des nationalismes et la multiplication des revendications identitaires, un risque croissant d'incommunication.Information technologyMilitary art and scienceData processingSoldiersEffect of technological innovations onCyberspace operations (Military science)Armed Forces and mass mediainternetpropagandecensurecommunicationinformationguerreInformation technology.Military art and scienceData processing.SoldiersEffect of technological innovations on.Cyberspace operations (Military science)Armed Forces and mass media.Boursier Jean-Yves1307404Chéron Bénédicte1316887Danet Didier1316888Huyghe François-Bernard1292975Jankowski Barbara1316889Letonturier Éric1288311Sage Michel1316890Schehr Sébastien1316891Thiéblemont André1316892Ventre Daniel847420Letonturier Éric1288311FR-FrMaCLEBOOK9910495767703321Guerre, armées et communication3032802UNINA04266nam 2200793 450 991081530590332120230807211008.03-11-034803-93-11-038464-710.1515/9783110348033(CKB)3360000000515178(EBL)1563399(SSID)ssj0001433324(PQKBManifestationID)11791197(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001433324(PQKBWorkID)11414078(PQKB)11144639(MiAaPQ)EBC1563399(DE-B1597)246646(OCoLC)979838638(DE-B1597)9783110348033(Au-PeEL)EBL1563399(CaPaEBR)ebr11010384(CaONFJC)MIL808165(OCoLC)903959588(EXLCZ)99336000000051517820150209h20152015 uy 0engur|nu---uu|uutxtccrEvocations of the calf? Romans 1:18-2:11 and the substructure of Psalm 106 (105) /Alec J. LucasBerlin, [Germany] ;Boston, [Massachusetts] :De Gruyter,2015.©20151 online resource (292 p.)Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft,0171-6441 ;Volume 201Description based upon print version of record.3-11-034735-0 Includes bibliographical references and indexes.Front matter --Acknowledgments --Preface --Contents --List of Tables --List of Abbreviations --Chapter 1: Introduction --Chapter 2: Psalm 106(105) --Chapter 3: Romans 1:18-2:11 --Chapter 4: Sketching a Larger Context --Chapter 5: Conclusion --Bibliography --Index of Authors --Index of Subjects --Index of Ancient SourcesThis study proposes that both constitutively and rhetorically (through ironic, inferential, and indirect application), Ps 106(105) serves as the substructure for Paul's argumentation in Rom 1:18-2:11. Constitutively, Rom 1:18-32 hinges on the triadic interplay between "they (ex)changed" and "God gave them over," an interplay that creates a sin-retribution sequence with an a-ba-ba-b pattern. Both elements of this pattern derive from Ps 106(105):20, 41a respectively. Rhetorically, Paul ironically applies the psalmic language of idolatrous "(ex)change" and God's subsequent "giving-over" to Gentiles. Aiding this ironic application is that Paul has cast his argument in the mold of Hellenistic Jewish polemic against Gentile idolatry and immorality, similar to Wis 13-15. In Rom 2:1-4, however, Paul inferentially incorporates a hypocritical Jewish interlocutor into the preceding sequence through the charge of doing the "same," a charge that recalls Israel's sins recounted in Ps 106(105). This incorporation then gives way to an indirect application of Ps 106(105):23, by means of an allusion to Deut 9-10 in Rom 2:5-11. Secondarily, this study suggests that Paul's argumentation exploits an intra-Jewish debate in which evocations of the golden calf figured prominently.Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche ;Volume 201.Golden calf (Bible)Golden calf (Bible)IdolatryBiblical teaching(DE-601)104675314(DE-588)4015950-4Exegesegnd(DE-601)105825018(DE-588)4114051-5IntertextualitätgndRELIGION / Biblical Criticism & Interpretation / New TestamentbisacshGolden Calf.Psalm 106.Romans.Wisdom of Solomon.Golden calf (Bible)Golden calf (Bible).IdolatryBiblical teaching.ExegeseIntertextualitätRELIGION / Biblical Criticism & Interpretation / New Testament.227.106BC 7550rvkLucas Alec J.1975-1702913MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910815305903321Evocations of the calf4087771UNINA