03717nam 2200373z- 450 991049373370332120231214141133.0(CKB)5590000000537485(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/71531(EXLCZ)99559000000053748520202108d2021 |y 0gerurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierKonzeptverfahren als Instrument einer gemeinwohlorientierten StadtentwicklungBerlinUniversitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Berlin20211 electronic resource (144 p.)ISR Impulse Online (bis Bd. 50: ISR Graue Reihe)3-7983-3174-X Who should profit from urban planning? An increasing number of stakeholders currently demand that planning policy leads to added value for the entire urban society and not just for individual groups: Designing for the common good! One instrument of public real estate policy that negotiates the common good could be a conceptual allocation of public property (Konzeptverfahren). This instrument allows cities to allocate their land based on the quality of the idea for development and use instead of price-based bidding. In public invitations to tender, municipalities define a set of criteria that applicants can or must meet. The aim of this publication is to evaluate the orientation of such tenders towards the common good using a list of criteria compiled from the following existing assessments: The Federal Building Code (Baugesetzbuch); the city yield (Stadtrendite); a proposed federal policy to support not-for-profit housing companies (Wohngemeinnützigkeit); the Common Good Balance Sheet (Gemeinwohlökonomie); the Better-Life-Index (Wohlstandsforschung) and the common good criteria as defined in the federal tax code (Gemeinnützigkeit nach Abgabenordnung). Although there may be some variations in definitions of common good, at the core of these assessments are social criteria, ecological sustainability, and opportunities for participation. Beside these dominant categories, each assessment is supplemented by less common criteria which are grouped into six additional categories, giving an overview of how the common good is currently defined. This paper examines 28 invitations to tender based on the conceptual allocation of public property (Konzeptausschreibungen). Of these 28 invitations, each from a different German city, it was found that all contained, to some extent, the criteria for forming common good. As such, these tenders can be considered as supporting the common good. This script finds, however, that the categories participation, education and health should resonate more strongly in future tenders. The instrument (Konzeptverfahren) offers municipalities the opportunity to set development goals that are based on local needs and public interest criteria. But, as the comparison shows, there are significant differences between tendering procedures. Therefore, it should not be concluded that tendering based on the conceptual allocation of public property guarantees public interest-oriented urban development.Urban & municipal planningbicssccommon good real estate conceptional allocation public property public interestUrban & municipal planningGennies Monaauth1322409BOOK9910493733703321Konzeptverfahren als Instrument einer gemeinwohlorientierten Stadtentwicklung3034968UNINA04993nam 2200649Ia 450 991078454520332120200520144314.01-281-05585-997866110558510-08-048817-X(CKB)1000000000365121(EBL)293959(OCoLC)469499032(SSID)ssj0000097757(PQKBManifestationID)11122307(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000097757(PQKBWorkID)10120605(PQKB)10296051(Au-PeEL)EBL293959(CaPaEBR)ebr10186113(CaONFJC)MIL105585(MiAaPQ)EBC293959(PPN)139714456(EXLCZ)99100000000036512120070320d2007 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrAdvanced mechanics of composite materials[electronic resource] /Valery V. Vasiliev and Evgeny V. Morozov1st ed. -- T.p. verso.Amsterdam ;London Elsevier20071 online resource (505 p.)"2nd ed." -- On cover.0-08-045372-4 Includes bibliographical references and indexes.Front cover; ADVANCED MECHANICS OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS; Copyright page; Table of contents; PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION; Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION; 1.1. Structural materials; 1.2. Composite materials; 1.3. References; Chapter 2. FUNDAMENTALS OF MECHANICS OF SOLIDS; 2.1. Stresses; 2.2. Equilibrium equations; 2.3. Stress transformation; 2.4. Principal stresses; 2.5. Displacements and strains; 2.6. Transformation of small strains; 2.7. Compatibility equations; 2.8. Admissible static and kinematic fields; 2.9. Constitutive equations for an elastic solid; 2.10. Formulations of the problem2.11. Variational principles2.12. Reference; Chapter 3. MECHANICS OF A UNIDIRECTIONAL PLY; 3.1. Ply architecture; 3.2. Fiber-matrix interaction; 3.3. Micromechanics of a ply; 3.4. Mechanical properties of a ply under tension, shear, and compression; 3.5. Hybrid composites; 3.6. Composites with high fiber fraction; 3.7. Phenomenological homogeneous model of a ply; 3.8. References; Chapter 4. MECHANICS OF A COMPOSITE LAYER; 4.1. Isotropic layer; 4.2. Unidirectional orthotropic layer; 4.3. Unidirectional anisotropic layer; 4.4. Orthogonally reinforced orthotropic layer4.5. Angle-ply orthotropic layer4.6. Fabric layers; 4.7. Lattice layer; 4.8. Spatially reinforced layers and bulk materials; 4.9. References; Chapter 5. MECHANICS OF LAMINATES; 5.1. Stiffness coefficients of a generalized anisotropic layer; 5.2. Stiffness coefficients of a homogeneous layer; 5.3. Stiffness coefficients of a laminate; 5.4. Symmetric laminates; 5.5. Engineering stiffness coefficients of orthotropic laminates; 5.6. Quasi-homogeneous laminates; 5.7. Quasi-isotropic laminates; 5.8. Antisymmetric laminates; 5.9. Sandwich structures; 5.10. Coordinate of the reference plane5.11. Stresses in laminates5.12. Example; 5.13. References; Chapter 6. FAILURE CRITERIA AND STRENGTH OF LAMINATES; 6.1. Failure criteria for an elementary composite layer or ply; 6.2. Practical recommendations; 6.3. Examples; 6.4. Allowable stresses for laminates consisting of unidirectional plies; 6.5. References; Chapter 7. ENVIRONMENTAL, SPECIAL LOADING, AND MANUFACTURING EFFECTS; 7.1. Temperature effects; 7.2. Hygrothermal effects and aging; 7.3. Time and time-dependent loading effects; 7.4. Manufacturing effects; 7.5. References; Chapter 8. OPTIMAL COMPOSITE STRUCTURES8.1. Optimal fibrous structures8.2. Composite laminates of uniform strength; 8.3. Application to optimal composite structures; 8.4. References; AUTHOR INDEX; SUBJECT INDEXComposite materials have been representing most significant breakthroughs in various industrial applications, particularly in aerospace structures, during the past thirty five years. The primary goal of Advanced Mechanics of Composite Materials is the combined presentation of advanced mechanics, manufacturing technology, and analysis of composite materials. This approach lets the engineer take into account the essential mechanical properties of the material itself and special features of practical implementation, including manufacturing technology, experimental results, and design charaComposite materialsMechanical propertiesFibrous compositesMechanical propertiesComposite materialsMechanical properties.Fibrous compositesMechanical properties.620.11892Vasiliev Valery V471559Morozov Evgeny V1528729MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910784545203321Advanced mechanics of composite materials3772567UNINA