04074nam 22007455 450 991048870180332120230810173218.03-030-78067-89783030780678(electronic bk.)3030780678(electronic bk.)303078066X978303078066110.1007/978-3-030-78067-8(CKB)5590000000519707(MiAaPQ)EBC6665407(Au-PeEL)EBL6665407(OCoLC)1259592509(DE-He213)978-3-030-78067-8(PPN)258065737(EXLCZ)99559000000051970720210701d2021 u| 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentnrdamediancrdacarrierEquity in the Civil Law Tradition /by Renato Beneduzi1st ed. 2021.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2021.1 online resource3-030-78066-X Includes bibliographical references.Introduction -- Equity in Greece -- Equity in Rome -- Equity in the Middle Ages.-Equity in the Modern Era -- Equity since the 19th century 122 -- Conclusion.This is a book on “equity in the civil law tradition” from the double perspective of legal history and comparative law. It is intended not only for civil lawyers who want to better understand the role and history of equity in their own legal tradition, but also – and perhaps more saliently – for common lawyers who are curious about why the history of equity has unfolded so differently on the continent of Europe and in Latin America. The author begins with the investigation of the philosophical foundations of the Western notion of equity in the teachings of Plato and Aristotle and of how their ideas affected the works of the great Attic orators (chapter 2). He then addresses the way in which Roman law turned this notion into a legal concept of considerable practical importance (chapter 3) and how it survived the fall of Rome and was later elaborated in the Middle Ages by civilists and canonists (chapter 4). Subsequently, the author analyses how the notion of equity was dealt with in the Modern Era by legal humanists, Protestant and Catholic theologians, scholars of the usus modernus pandectarum and of Roman-Dutch law, and then by legal rationalism and the philosophers of the Enlightenment (chapter 5). He then deals with the history of equity on the continent since the fragmentation of the ius commune and the codifications of the nineteenth century and with its reception in Latin America (chapter 6). Finally, the author offers some closing remarks on the fundamental equivocalness (or relativity, as some scholars put it) of the notion of equity in the civil law tradition today (conclusion).Conflict of lawsConflict of lawsInternational lawComparative lawLawPhilosophyLawHistoryEquityTrusts and trusteesPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative LawTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal HistoryEquity and Trust in Common LawConflict of laws.Conflict of laws.International law.Comparative law.LawPhilosophy.LawHistory.Equity.Trusts and trustees.Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law.Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.Equity and Trust in Common Law.340.56Beneduzi Renato Resende1219450MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910488701803321Equity in the civil law tradition2819689UNINA