05099nam 22007935 450 991048499900332120200705013424.03-642-15838-210.1007/978-3-642-15838-4(CKB)2670000000045110(SSID)ssj0000446711(PQKBManifestationID)11269487(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000446711(PQKBWorkID)10504598(PQKB)11673199(DE-He213)978-3-642-15838-4(MiAaPQ)EBC3065886(PPN)147972329(PPN)149031777(EXLCZ)99267000000004511020100914d2010 u| 0engurnn|008mamaatxtccrPrivacy in Statistical Databases UNESCO Chair in Data Privacy, International Conference, PSD 2010, Corfu, Greece, September 22-24, 2010, Proceedings /edited by Josep Domingo-Ferrer, Emmanouil Magkos1st ed. 2010.Berlin, Heidelberg :Springer Berlin Heidelberg :Imprint: Springer,2010.1 online resource (XI, 297 p. 47 illus.) Information Systems and Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI ;6344Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph3-642-15837-4 Includes bibliographical references and index.Privacy in statistical databases is a discipline whose purpose is to provide so- tionstothetensionbetweenthesocial,political,economicandcorporatedemand for accurate information, and the legal and ethical obligation to protect the p- vacy of the various parties involved. Those parties are the respondents (the individuals and enterprises to which the database records refer), the data o- ers (those organizations spending money in data collection) and the users (the ones querying the database or the search engine, who would like their queries to stay con?dential). Beyond law and ethics, there are also practical reasons for data-collecting agencies and corporations to invest in respondent privacy: if individual respondents feel their privacy guaranteed, they are likely to provide moreaccurateresponses. Data ownerprivacyis primarilymotivatedbypractical considerations: if an enterprise collects data at its own expense, it may wish to minimize leakage of those data to other enterprises (even to those with whom joint data exploitation is planned). Finally, user privacy results in increaseduser satisfaction, even if it may curtail the ability of the database owner to pro?le users. Thereareatleasttwotraditionsinstatisticaldatabaseprivacy,bothofwhich started in the 1970s: the ?rst one stems from o?cial statistics, where the dis- pline is also known as statistical disclosure control (SDC), and the second one originates from computer science and database technology. In o?cial statistics, the basic concern is respondent privacy. In computer science, the initial mo- vation was also respondent privacy but, from 2000 onwards, growing attention has been devoted to owner privacy (privacy-preserving data mining) and user privacy (private informationretrieval).Information Systems and Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI ;6344Database managementComputer communication systemsComputer securityData encryption (Computer science)Data structures (Computer science)Database Managementhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/I18024Computer Communication Networkshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/I13022Systems and Data Securityhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/I28060Cryptologyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/I28020Data Structureshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/I15017Data Structures and Information Theoryhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/I15009Kerkira <2010>swdKongressswdDatabase management.Computer communication systems.Computer security.Data encryption (Computer science).Data structures (Computer science).Database Management.Computer Communication Networks.Systems and Data Security.Cryptology.Data Structures.Data Structures and Information Theory.005.8Domingo-Ferrer Josepedthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtMagkos Emmanouiledthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtUNESCO Chair in Data Privacy.PSD 2010BOOK9910484999003321Privacy in Statistical Databases2916060UNINA