03852nam 22006375 450 991048403850332120200919062738.01-4939-2056-110.1007/978-1-4939-2056-3(CKB)3710000000239336(EBL)1966984(OCoLC)891594953(SSID)ssj0001354103(PQKBManifestationID)11779910(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001354103(PQKBWorkID)11323552(PQKB)10710493(DE-He213)978-1-4939-2056-3(MiAaPQ)EBC1966984(PPN)181350173(EXLCZ)99371000000023933620140915d2015 u| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrDeveloping and Maintaining Police-Researcher Partnerships to Facilitate Research Use A Comparative Analysis /by Jeff Rojek, Peter Martin, Geoffrey P. Alpert1st ed. 2015.New York, NY :Springer New York :Imprint: Springer,2015.1 online resource (94 p.)SpringerBriefs in Translational Criminology,2194-6442Description based upon print version of record.1-4939-2055-3 Includes bibliographical references.Introduction -- Brief Review of Research Highlights -- Examples of successful and unsuccessful translation -- Final thoughts and conclusion.This Brief discusses methods to develop and maintain police – researcher partnerships.  First, the authors provide information that will be useful to police managers and researchers who are interested in creating and maintaining partnerships to conduct research, work together to improve policing and help others understand the linkages between the two groups.  Then, more specifically, they describe how police managers consider and utilize research in policing and criminal justice and its findings from a management perspective in both the United States and Australia.  While both countries experience similar issues of trust, acceptance, utility, and accountability between researchers and practitioners, the experiences in the countries differ.  In the United States with 17,000 agencies, the use of research findings by police agencies requires understanding, diffusion and acceptance.  In Australia with a small number of larger agencies, the problems of research-practitioner partnerships have different translational issues, including acceptance and application.  As long as police practitioners and academic researchers hold distinct and different impressions of each other, the likelihood of positive, cooperative, and sustainable agreements between them will suffer.SpringerBriefs in Translational Criminology,2194-6442CriminologyEconomic sociologyCriminology and Criminal Justice, generalhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/1B0000Organizational Studies, Economic Sociologyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X22020Criminology.Economic sociology.Criminology and Criminal Justice, general.Organizational Studies, Economic Sociology.300306.3364Rojek Jeffauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1229585Martin Peterauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autAlpert Geoffrey Pauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autBOOK9910484038503321Developing and Maintaining Police-Researcher Partnerships to Facilitate Research Use2854124UNINA