04547nam 22007455 450 991048318660332120200920173400.03-319-01686-510.1007/978-3-319-01686-3(CKB)3710000000025280(EBL)1466348(OCoLC)861558903(SSID)ssj0001049373(PQKBManifestationID)11678722(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001049373(PQKBWorkID)11018510(PQKB)10447089(MiAaPQ)EBC1466348(DE-He213)978-3-319-01686-3(PPN)17610464X(EXLCZ)99371000000002528020131001d2014 u| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrBeneficial Ownership Basic and Federal Indian Law Aspects of a Concept /by Matthias Reinhard-DeRoo1st ed. 2014.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2014.1 online resource (178 p.)Description based upon print version of record.3-319-01685-7 Includes bibliographical references.Introduction -- The Term Beneficial Ownership -- Beneficial Ownership as a Concept -- Common Law, Equity and Beneficial Ownership -- Beneficial Ownership Used in U.S. Supreme Court Decisions -- Fundamental Aspects of Federal Indian Law -- The Beneficial Ownership Concept Applied in Federal Indian Law -- Epilogue.The hunt for beneficial owners is on. Like an elephant, the beneficial owner hides in the jungle of complex legal structures, waiting to be discovered by eager prosecutors. But what lies behind this metaphor? What is a Beneficial Owner? Is beneficial ownership a right? What does this right encompass? What is the value of this right compared to other rights? And if beneficial ownership is not a right, is it still a legally relevant relation? How do courts, namely the U.S. Supreme Court deal with the concept?  When do Anglo-American judges and European scholars resort to the concept? This book approaches these questions from two perspectives: legal fundamentals and the field of U.S. federal Indian law. Both legal theories and case law are scrutinized with the aim to find a better understanding of the basic conception and characteristics of beneficial ownership.  Federal Indian law has been chosen for the study of the concrete implications of the beneficial ownership concept in what Roscoe Pound referred to as “the law in action.” To some, this choice of legal field might seem somewhat unusual. What answers could federal Indian law possibly offer with regard to pressing questions from the financial industry? As always, there is a short and a long answer. The short answer is that the analysis of an equally sophisticated field of law can open new perspectives on a given field of law. For example, not only potential criminals and tax evaders but also members of an older civilization are beneficial owners. The long answer can be found in this very book.Private international lawConflict of lawsLaw—PhilosophyLawAnthropologyCultural heritagePrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R14002Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal Historyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R11011Anthropologyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X12000Cultural Heritagehttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/419000Private international law.Conflict of laws.Law—Philosophy.Law.Anthropology.Cultural heritage.Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law .Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.Anthropology.Cultural Heritage.301340340.1340.2Reinhard-DeRoo Matthiasauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1082024BOOK9910483186603321Beneficial Ownership2596949UNINA