04359nam 2200589 450 991047994950332120220427234357.090-04-38302-610.1163/9789004383029(CKB)4100000007010350(MiAaPQ)EBC5615308(nllekb)BRILL9789004383029(ScCtBLL)f0ab5a1f-2fe1-44b6-b6c3-8c49ab89b3e7(EXLCZ)99410000000701035020180820d2018 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierEconomic imperatives for women's writing in early modern Europe /edited by Carme Font Paz and Nina GeerdinkBoston :Brill,[2018]1 online resource (272 pages)Women writers in history ;volume 290-04-38299-2 Includes bibliographical references and index.Introduction: Women, Professionalisation, and Patronage /Carme Font Paz and Nina Geerdink --Women Authors’ Reputation and Its Relationship to Money Earned: Some Early French Writers as Examples /Suzan van Dijk --Words for Sale: Early Modern Spanish Women’s Literary Economy /Nieves Baranda --Fighting for Her Profession: Dorothe Engelbretsdatter’s Discourse of Self-Defence /Marie Nedregotten Sørbø --Writing for Patronage or Patronage for Writing? Two Case Studies in Seventeenth-Century and Post-Restoration Women’s Poetry in Britain /Carme Font Paz --Possibilities of Patronage: The Dutch Poet Elisabeth Hoofman and Her German Patrons /Nina Geerdink --Between Patronage and Professional Writing. The Situation of Eighteenth Century Women of Letters in Venice: The Example of Luisa Bergalli Gozzi /Rotraud von Kulessa --From Queen’s Librarian to Voice of the Neapolitan Republic: Eleonora de Fonseca Pimentel /Irene Zanini-Cordi --“[S]ome employment in the translating Way”: Economic Imperatives in Charlotte Lennox’s Career as a Translator /Marianna D’Ezio --Beating the Odds: Sophie Albrecht (1756–1840), a Successful Woman Writer and Publisher in Eighteenth-Century Germany /Berit C.R. Royer.Economic Imperatives for Women’s Writing in Early Modern Europe delves into the early modern history of women’s authorship and literary production in Europe taking a material turn. The case studies included in the volume represent women writers from various European countries and comparatively reflect the nuances of their participation in a burgeoning commercial market for authors while profiting as much from patronage. From self-representation as professional writers to literary reception, the challenges of reputation, financial hardships, and relationships with editors and colleagues, the essays in this collection show from different theoretical standpoints and linguistic areas that gender biases played a far less limiting role in women’s literary writing than is commonly assumed, while they determined the relationship between moneymaking, self-representation, and publishing strategies.Women Writers in History ;2.European literatureWomen authorsHistory and criticismWomen authors, EuropeanEarly modern, 1500-1700Women authors, EuropeanEconomic conditionsWomen and literatureEuropeHistoryEarly modern, 1500-1700AuthorshipEconomic aspectsHistoryEuropeEarly modern, 1500-1700Authors and patronsHistoryEarly modern, 1500-1700Literature publishingEuropeHistoryEarly modern, 1500-1700European literatureWomen authorsHistory and criticism.Women authors, EuropeanWomen authors, EuropeanEconomic conditions.Women and literatureHistoryAuthorshipEconomic aspectsHistoryAuthors and patronsHistoryLiterature publishingHistory809.89287Font Paz CarmeGeerdink NinaNL-LeKBNL-LeKBBOOK9910479949503321Economic imperatives for women's writing in early modern Europe1896215UNINA03051 am 2200553 n 450 9910495992203321202007202-36781-379-510.4000/books.pulm.6127(CKB)5590000000006282(FrMaCLE)OB-pulm-6127(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/86285(PPN)251072258(EXLCZ)99559000000000628220201116j|||||||| ||| 0freuu||||||m||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierLe primitivisme mélancolique d’Edward S. Curtis /Mathilde ArrivéMontpellier Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée20201 online resource (326 p.) Horizons anglophones2-36781-295-0 Entre 1907 et 1930, Edward S. Curtis publie les vingt volumes de son encyclopédie pictorialiste, The North American Indian, où dialoguent des propositions iconographiques et idéologiques souvent concurrentes, oscillant entre éthos assimilationniste et primitiviste. Au carrefour de différents régimes de visibilité — l’art, la science, le patrimoine, la surveillance et le spectacle — le photographe teste les représentations de l’autochtonie héritées du XIXe siècle à l’épreuve des schémas identitaires émergents, dans des images et contre-images qui traduisent les ambivalences de la rationalité coloniale et le statut politique incertain des Amérindiens. Érigeant la disparition en enseigne rhétorique de son grand œuvre, Curtis bâtit un monument paradoxal, entre commémoration et oubli. Le présent ouvrage propose d’interroger ces conflictualités et d’analyser les enjeux historiographiques, éditoriaux, socio-politiques, mémoriels, épistémiques et méta-photographiques du pictorialisme ethnographique de Curtis, en envisageant The North American Indian comme un laboratoire des codes et des identités, un dispositif d’(in)visibilisation des populations amérindiennes, un lieu de mémoire hanté et un trait d’union entre romantisme et modernisme.AnthropologyOuest américain XIXe-XXe sièclesethnographieculture visuellereprésentation des Amérindiensmémoire et modernitésOuest américain XIXe-XXe sièclesethnographieculture visuellereprésentation des Amérindiensmémoire et modernitésAnthropologyOuest américain XIXe-XXe sièclesethnographieculture visuellereprésentation des Amérindiensmémoire et modernitésArrivé Mathilde1282938FR-FrMaCLEBOOK9910495992203321Le primitivisme mélancolique d’Edward S. Curtis3018903UNINA02755oam 22003853a 450 991069354410332120230622022822.0(NBER)w6428(NBER)w8451(NBER)w1891(CKB)3240000000019680(EXLCZ)99324000000001968020230622d1998 fy 0engurcnu||||||||Social SecurityPrivatization and Progressivity /Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Kent A. Smetters, Jan WalliserCambridge, MassNational Bureau of Economic Research19981 online resourceillustrations (black and white);NBER working paper seriesno. w6428February 1998.This paper uses a large-scale overlapping generations model that features intragenerational heterogeneity to show that privatizing the U.S. Social Security System could be done on a progressive basis. We start with a close replica of the current system; specifically, we include Social Security's progressive linkages between taxes paid and benefits received. The paper compares achieving progressivity as part of privatization reform by a) providing a pay-as-you-go-financed minimum benefit to all agents at retirement independent of their contributions and b) matching contributions to private retirement accounts on a progressive basis. Although a pay-as-you-go-financed minimum benefit can enhance progressivity, it comes at the cost of substantially smaller long-run macroeconomic and welfare gains. The reasons are two: First, the ongoing unfunded liability to pay for the minimum benefit is roughly half of the unfunded liability of the current Social Security system. Maintaining this liability limits the effect of privatization on saving and capital accumulation. Second, the tax financing the flat minimum benefit is completely distortionary since the benefit one receives is independent of what one contributes. In contrast, matching worker's contributions on a progressive basis can achieve an equally progressive intragenerational distribution of welfare. But it affords much higher long-run levels of capital, labor supply, output and welfare.Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research)no. w6428.Social Security and Public PensionsjelcSocial Security and Public PensionsH55jelcKotlikoff Laurence J124852Smetters Kent A1363736Walliser Jan1143280National Bureau of Economic Research.MaCbNBERMaCbNBERBOOK9910693544103321Social Security3384677UNINA