03353nam 2200613 450 991046791670332120200923020339.03-11-049808-13-11-049920-710.1515/9783110499209(CKB)4340000000194617(MiAaPQ)EBC4947043(DE-B1597)470619(OCoLC)1003246250(OCoLC)1013728125(DE-B1597)9783110499209(PPN)219911533(Au-PeEL)EBL4947043(CaPaEBR)ebr11423788(OCoLC)1001372665(EXLCZ)99434000000019461720170905h20172017 uy 0gerurcnu||||||||rdacontentrdamediardacarrierAristoteles gegen Epikur Eine Untersuchung über die Prinzipien der hellenistischen Philosophie ausgehend vom Phänomen der Bewegung /Andree HahmannBerlin, [Germany] ;Boston, [Massachusetts] :De Gruyter,2017.©20171 online resource (472 pages) illustrations, tablesUntersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte,1862-1112 ;Band 1253-11-050025-6 Includes bibliographical references and index.Frontmatter -- Vorwort -- Inhalt -- Einleitung -- Kapitel I – Form und Materie in der Wahrnehmung -- Kapitel II – Die Atome, das Leere und die atomaren Bilder -- Kapitel III – Naturabsicht und Selbsterhaltung -- Kapitel IV – Das Feuer der Wahrnehmung -- Kapitel V – Vorsehung, Zufall und Theodizee -- Ergebnis -- Anhang: Ist Kant der bessere Stoiker? -- Verzeichnis der verwendeten Siglen -- Glossar -- Literaturverzeichnis -- Sachregister -- Personenregister Die Zurückweisung, mit der viele frühneuzeitliche Autoren der aristotelischen Naturphilosophie begegnen, geht häufig mit einer emphatischen Aufnahme der hellenistischen Philosophie einher. Vor diesem Hintergrund fragt die vorliegende Untersuchung nach den prinzipiellen Unterschieden zwischen Aristoteles und seinen hellenistischen Nachfolgern. Ausgangspunkt ist die für die aristotelische Philosophie zentrale Analyse des Phänomens der Bewegung. It is well known that Early Modern philosophers rejected Aristotelian philosophy of nature. At the same time, they passionately embraced the major Hellenistic schools of philosophy. The study takes this fact as a point of departure to explain the fundamental differences between Aristotle and his Hellenistic successors. At the heart of the investigation lies Aristotle’s discussion of motion, which is essential for many Aristotelian conceptions. Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte ;Band 125.Philosophy, AncientPhilosophyHistoryEpicureans (Greek philosophy)Electronic books.Philosophy, Ancient.PhilosophyHistory.Epicureans (Greek philosophy)180Hahmann Andree1047060MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910467916703321Aristoteles gegen Epikur2474406UNINA03624oam 2200745I 450 991078399110332120230617041559.01-134-34212-81-134-34213-61-280-22412-697866102241280-203-34389-1(CKB)1000000000253495(EBL)200553(OCoLC)437061314(SSID)ssj0000240306(PQKBManifestationID)11176253(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000240306(PQKBWorkID)10266354(PQKB)10032815(MiAaPQ)EBC200553(Au-PeEL)EBL200553(CaPaEBR)ebr10163106(CaONFJC)MIL22412(OCoLC)252724215(FlBoTFG)9780203343890(EXLCZ)99100000000025349520181122d2004 uy 0engur||| |||||txtccrRussian-Muslim Confrontation in the Caucasus Alternative Visions of the Conflict between Imam Shamil and the Russians, 1830-1859 /by Gary Hamburg, Thomas Sanders and Ernest Tucker1st ed.Boca Raton, FL :Routledge,2004.1 online resource (256 p.)SOAS/RoutledgeCurzon studies on the Middle EastDescription based upon print version of record.0-415-47879-0 0-415-32590-0 Includes bibliographical references and index.Cover; RUSSIAN-MUSLIM CONFRONTATION IN THE CAUCASUS: Alternative visions of the conflict between Imam Shamil and the Russians, 1830-1859; Copyright; CONTENTS; PREFACE; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; NOTE ON TRANSLITERATION; CHRONOLOGY; MAPS; INTRODUCTION; Part I INTRODUCTION; THE SHINING OF DAGHESTANI SWORDS IN CERTAIN CAMPAIGNS OF SHAMIL (SELECTED PASSAGES); Part II INTRODUCTION; HADJI MURAT; Part III WAR OF WORLDS; A COMMENTARY ON THE TWO TEXTS IN THEIR HISTORICAL CONTEXT; GLOSSARY; INDEXThis book presents two extraordinary texts - The Shining of Swords by Al-Qarakhi and a new translation for a contemporary readership of Leo Tolstoy's Hadji Murat - illuminating the mountain war between the Muslim peoples of the Caucasus and the imperial Russian army from 1830 to 1859. The authors offer a complete commentary on the various intellectual and religious contexts that shaped the two texts and explain the historical significance of the Russian-Muslim confrontation. It is shown that the mountain war was a clash of two cultures, two religious outlooks and two different worlds. The book provides an important background for the ongoing contest between Russia and indigenous people for control of the Caucasus.SOAS/RoutledgeCurzon studies on the Middle East.HISTORY / Middle East / GeneralbisacshHISTORY / Europe / Russia & the Former Soviet UnionbisacshHISTORYEthnic relationsDagestan (Russia)History19th centuryDagestan (Russia)Ethnic relationsHISTORY / Middle East / General.HISTORY / Europe / Russia & the Former Soviet Union.HISTORY.Ethnic relations.947.5/073/088297Hamburg Gary1567878Sanders ThomasTucker ErnestFlBoTFGFlBoTFGBOOK9910783991103321Russian-Muslim Confrontation in the Caucasus3839618UNINA