04079nam 2200685 a 450 991046485320332120170821155902.01-4623-9314-41-4527-6826-91-282-55827-71-4519-1324-99786613822406(CKB)3360000000443275(EBL)1607690(SSID)ssj0000952498(PQKBManifestationID)11505011(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000952498(PQKBWorkID)10919238(PQKB)10543475(OCoLC)535146962(MiAaPQ)EBC1607690(EXLCZ)99336000000044327520090811d2008 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrEvaluating alternative approaches to poverty alleviation[electronic resource] rice tariffs versus targeted transfers in Madagascar /prepared by David Coady, Paul Dorosh, and Bart MintenWashington, D.C. International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Dept.20081 online resource (30 p.)IMF working paper ;WP/08/9"January 2008."1-4518-6871-5 Includes bibliographical references (p. 27-28).Contents; I. Introduction; II. A Partial Equilibrium Model; A. The Model; B. Rice Tariff Reform; C. Targeted Transfers; D. Welfare Weights; III. The Welfare Impact of Tariffs and Transfers; A. Lowering Rice Tariffs; Figures; 1. Cumulative Densities of Per Capita Consumption; 2a. Net Sellers/Buyers by Welfare Group, Urban; 2b. Net Sellers/Buyers by Welfare Group, Rural; 3a. Net Purchases by Welfare Group: Urban; 3b. Net Purchases by Welfare Group: Rural; 4a. Welfare Impact of Rice Price Decrease: Urban; 4b. Welfare Impact of Rice Price Decrease, Rural; Tables1. Distribution of Welfare Impact from Tariff Increase Across Households2. Marginal Cost of Public Funds for Different Import Elasticities; 3. Welfare Impact of Lower Rice Tariff; B. Targeted Transfers; 5. Undercoverage and Leakage, Urban and Rural; C. Tariffs, Transfers, or Both?; 4. Welfare Impact of Proxy-Means Targeted Transfers; IV. From Partial to General Equilibrium Analysis; 6. Welfare Impact of Tariff Reductions and Targeted Transfers; V. Summary and Conclusions; Appendix; I. The Madagascar EPM Household Survey; Appendix Table; 5. Mean Per Capita Consumption and Welfare WeightsReferencesThis paper uses a partial equilibrium framework to evaluate the relative efficiency, distributional and revenue implications of rice tariffs and targeted transfers in Madagascar, especially in the context of identifying their respective roles for poverty alleviation. Although there are likely to be substantial efficiency gains from tariff reductions, these accrue mainly to higher income households. In addition, poor net rice sellers will lose from lower tariffs. Developing a system of well designed and implemented targeted direct transfers to poor households is thus likely to be a substanIMF working paper ;WP/08/9.Rice tradeMadagascarEconometric modelsTariff on farm produceMadagascarEconometric modelsPovertyMadagascarEconometric modelsMadagascarEconomic policyEconometric modelsMadagascarEconomic conditionsEconometric modelsElectronic books.Rice tradeEconometric models.Tariff on farm produceEconometric models.PovertyEconometric models.Coady David629944Dorosh Paul Anthony914310Minten Bart914311International Monetary Fund.Fiscal Affairs Dept.MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910464853203321Evaluating alternative approaches to poverty alleviation2048454UNINA