03892nam 22007333u 450 991046423500332120210117133248.01-4623-9311-X1-4527-7328-91-4518-7179-11-282-84254-49786612842542(CKB)3170000000055207(EBL)1608187(SSID)ssj0000940757(PQKBManifestationID)11492017(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000940757(PQKBWorkID)10955942(PQKB)11670850(MiAaPQ)EBC1608187(MiAaPQ)EBC3013326(Au-PeEL)EBL1608187(OCoLC)870245358(EXLCZ)99317000000005520720140210d2009|||| u|| |engur|n|---|||||txtccrEvaluating Historical CGER Assessments[electronic resource]Washington International Monetary Fund20091 online resource (29 p.)IMF Working PapersDescription based upon print version of record.1-4519-1615-9 Contents; I. Introduction; Box; 1. An Overview of CGER Exchange Rate Assessment Methodologies; II. Evaluating Misalignment Assessments for Advanced Economies; A. Mean Prediction Error; Figures; 1. Mean Prediction Error; B. Panel Regressions; Tables; 1. Panel Regression Results using Midpoint of CGER Assessment; 2. Panel Regression Results using MB Misalignment Estimate; C. Individual Country Diagnostics; 3. Evaluation Diagnostics using MB Estimates; 2. Scatterplots of Realized vs. Predicted Changes in REER; D. Evaluating Current Account Movements; 4. Panel Regression Results using CA NormIII. Cross-Section Analysis of the Fall 2006 CGER Estimates5. Country Coverage of the Expanded CGER Exercise.; 3. Undconditional Scatterplots, 27 CGER Countries; 6. Regression Results using Midpoint of CGER Assessment; 4. Conditional Scatterplots using Midpoint of CGER Assessment; 7. Regression Results using Individual CGER Methodologies; IV. Conclusion; 8. Regression Results using Midpoint of CGER Assessment, Different Horizons.......; References; Appendices; 1. Pooled Regression Results; 2. Description of Diagnostic Statistics.; 3. Data AppendixThe IMF's Consultative Group on Exchange Rate issues (CGER) has been conducting exchange rate assessments as part of the surveillance process since 1997. This paper evaluates CGER assessments from 1997 to 2006, by comparing these to subsequent movements in real effective exchange rates (REER). We find that CGER's estimated misalignments have predictive power over future REER movements, especially over longer horizons and after changes in fundamentals are accounted for. But while CGER misalignments frequently predict the direction of currency movements correctly, misalignments have tended to beIMF Working PapersForeign exchange rates -- Mathematical modelsForeign exchangeMonetary policy -- Mathematical modelsFinanceHILCCBusiness & EconomicsHILCCInternational FinanceHILCCElectronic books.Foreign exchange rates -- Mathematical models.Foreign exchange.Monetary policy -- Mathematical models.FinanceBusiness & EconomicsInternational Finance339.267Lee Jungjin1035547Abiad Abdul976405Kannan Prakash876248AU-PeELAU-PeELAU-PeELBOOK9910464235003321Evaluating Historical CGER Assessments2455298UNINA