04074nam 2200649 450 991046400620332120170821160802.01-4623-5075-51-4518-6952-51-282-84046-01-4519-8325-59786612840463(CKB)3170000000054997(EBL)1605809(SSID)ssj0000944002(PQKBManifestationID)11503137(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000944002(PQKBWorkID)10978597(PQKB)11111811(OCoLC)276785726(MiAaPQ)EBC1605809(EXLCZ)99317000000005499720140227h20082008 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrCorporate governance reforms in the EU do they matter and how? /Iryna Ivaschenko and Petya Koeva Brooks[Washington, District of Columbia] :International Monetary Fund,2008.©20081 online resource (31 p.)IMF Working PapersIMF working paper ;WP/08/91Description based upon print version of record.1-4519-1406-7 Includes bibliographical references.Contents; I. Introduction; II. National and EU Corporate Governance Reforms; A. National Reforms; B. EU Reforms; III. Measuring the Private Value of Control; IV. Data and Methodology; A. Data Sample and Descriptive Statistics; B. Empirical Strategy; V. Main Findings; A. Voting Premiums Across Time and Countries; B. Have Reforms Reduced the Private Benefits of Control?; C. Have Reforms Brought About Convergence in Corporate Control?; VI. Conclusions; References; Tables; 1. Italy: National Corporate Reform; 2. Germany: National Corporate Governance Reforms3. France: National Corporate Governance Reforms4. EU Corporate Governance Reforms; 5. Number of Dual-Class Firms by Country; 6. Voting Premium: Summary Statistics; 7. Voting Premiums Year Effects; 8. Voting Premium Distributed Year Effects; 9. Relative Effectiveness of Reforms in C3 Compared to the EU and Non-EU Peers, by Year; 10. Relative Effectiveness of Reforms Compared to Control Groups: A Summary; 11. Voting Premiums: Year Effects, Accounting for Product Market Reforms12. Relative Effectiveness of Reforms in C3 Compared to the EU and Non-EU Peers, Accounting for Product Market Reforms, by Year13. Distribution Characteristics of Voting Premiums, Pooled for All EU Countries; Figures; 1. Dynamic of the Voting Premiums Acorss Countries, 1992-2007; 2. Reform Efforts: Number of Important Corporate Governance Reforms Per Year; 3. Number of National and EU Corporate Governance Reforms; 4. Convergence in Voting Premiums Across Countries; 5. Distribution of Voting Premium Across EU Countries, by YearThis paper proposes a new approach to quantifying the effects of corporate governance reforms, by focusing on the dynamics of the voting premiums, a measure of the private benefits of control in a corporation. The results indicate that the reforms have been successful in reducing the voting premiums EU-wide. Moreover, more intense and broad reform efforts (such as introducing national reforms beyond and above the EU-wide initiatives) bring higher and longer lasting benefits. Our findings also suggest that the market for corporate control in Europe has become more integrated, as illustrated by IMF Working PapersCorporate governanceEuropeCase studiesCorporate governanceElectronic books.Corporate governanceCorporate governance.338.6094Ivaschenko Iryna862008Koeva Brooks Petya862009MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910464006203321Corporate governance reforms in the EU1924030UNINA