04240nam 2200673Ia 450 991046303840332120220223000943.00-8047-8676-310.1515/9780804786768(CKB)2670000000389962(SSID)ssj0000918390(PQKBManifestationID)12467261(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000918390(PQKBWorkID)10906791(PQKB)11495447(MiAaPQ)EBC1211881(DE-B1597)564348(DE-B1597)9780804786768(PPN)178288365(Au-PeEL)EBL1211881(CaPaEBR)ebr10739140(OCoLC)851972017(OCoLC)1178770001(EXLCZ)99267000000038996220121030d2013 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrMilitary adaptation in Afghanistan[electronic resource] /edited by Theo Farrell, Frans Osinga and James A. RussellStanford, Calif. Stanford Security Studies[2013]xv, 345 pBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-8047-8588-0 0-8047-8589-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Contents --Acknowledgments --Contributors --Abbreviations --1. Introduction: Military Adaptation in War --2. The Great Game and the Quagmire: Military Adaptation in the British and Soviet Wars in Afghanistan, 1839 –1989 --3. Into the Great Wadi: The United States and the War in Afghanistan --4. ISAF and NATO : Campaign Innovation and Organizational Adaptation --5. Back from the Brink: British Military Adaptation and the Struggle for Helmand, 2006–2011 --6. The Military Metier: Second Order Adaptation and the Danish Experience in Task Force Helmand --7. Soft Power, the Hard Way: Adaptation by the Netherlands’ Task Force Uruzgan --8. Mission Command without a Mission: German Military Adaptation in Afghanistan --9. Canadian Forces in Afghanistan: Minority Government and Generational Change while under Fire --10. Military Adaptation by the Taliban, 2002–2011 --11. Shoulder-to-Shoulder Fighting Different Wars: NATO Advisors and Military Adaptation in the Afghan National Army, 2001–2011 --12. Conclusion: Military Adaptation and the War in Afghanistan --IndexWhen NATO took charge of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) for Afghanistan in 2003, ISAF conceptualized its mission largely as a stabilization and reconstruction deployment. However, as the campaign has evolved and the insurgency has proved to more resistant and capable, key operational imperatives have emerged, including military support to the civilian development effort, closer partnering with Afghan security forces, and greater military restraint. All participating militaries have adapted, to varying extents, to these campaign imperatives and pressures. This book analyzes these initiatives and their outcomes by focusing on the experiences of three groups of militaries: those of Britain, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, and the US, which have faced the most intense operational and strategic pressures; Germany, who's troops have faced the greatest political and cultural constraints; and the Afghan National Army (ANA) and the Taliban, who have been forced to adapt to a very different sets of circumstances.Afghan War, 2001-2021Operational art (Military science)Case studiesTacticsCase studiesMilitary policyCase studiesElectronic books.Afghan War, 2001-2021.Operational art (Military science)TacticsMilitary policy958.104/74Farrell Theo1967-1044727Osinga Frans P. B1044728Russell James A(James Avery),1958-915961MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910463038403321Military adaptation in Afghanistan2470530UNINA