03766oam 2200637I 450 991046259010332120200520144314.01-135-97753-40-203-53399-210.4324/9780203533994 (CKB)2670000000357881(EBL)1186414(SSID)ssj0000904469(PQKBManifestationID)12395410(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000904469(PQKBWorkID)10922305(PQKB)11171028(OCoLC)842882006(MiAaPQ)EBC1186414(Au-PeEL)EBL1186414(CaPaEBR)ebr10699351(CaONFJC)MIL487103(OCoLC)843642552(EXLCZ)99267000000035788120180706e20131968 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrDeity and morality, with regard to the naturalistic fallacy /Burton F. PorterLondon ;New York :Routledge,2013.1 online resource (267 p.)Routledge Library Editions: Philosophy of Religion ;Volume 31"First published in 1968"--T.p. verso.1-138-96731-9 0-415-82218-1 Cover; Half Title; Title Page; Copyright Page; Original Title Page; Original Copyright Page; Acknowledgements; Table of Contents; I. The Naturalistic Fallacy; A. The Nature of the Fallacy; B. The Application of the Fallacy; II. David Hume; A. Hume's Philosophical Position; B. Hume's Theological Position; III. Divine Command, Goodness and Obedience; A. Hume's Fallacy and Theological Naturalism; B. Kierkegaard's 'Paradox of Faith'; IV. Deity and Morality; A. Mediaeval Attitudes; B. Contemporary Thoughts; V. The Doctrine of Ineffability; A. Mystical Knowledge; B. Rudolph Otto's 'Numinous'VI. Religious Discourse and Poetic LanguageA. Revelation and Inspiration; B. Myth and Images; VII. The 'Logical Parallels' Approach to Religious Language; A. Anomalistic Language and Analogy; B. Religious Language: Its Logical Behaviour and Ontological Status; VIII. 'God is Good': An Analytic Proposition; A. The Essential Goodness of God; B. Connotation and Denotation; IX. The Connotation of Proper Names; A. Proper Names and Descriptive Terms; B. Proper Names and General Meaning; X. The Concept of God; A. Comparative Conceptions of Deity; B. Analytic Propositions: Real or VerbalAppendix: An Analysis of the Key Terms InvolvedA. 'Is', 'Fact' and 'Description'; B. 'Ought', 'Value' and 'Normative'; IndexThis book describes the ""naturalistic fallacy"", as attributed to Hume, that non-moral premises cannot logically entail a moral conclusion, and distinguishes it from the similarly named though subtly different fallacy identified by Moore in Principia Ethica by comparing and contrasting its presence in a range of ethical or moral systems. A review of Hume's position elicits the implications to theological naturalism, and how this relates to Kierkegaard's ""paradox of faith"" and the doctrine of ineffability. Methods of logical examination of religious language are discussed, leading to theRoutledge library editions.Philosophy of religion.Religion and ethicsNaturalistic fallacyElectronic books.Religion and ethics.Naturalistic fallacy.200/.1Porter Burton Frederick.868398MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910462590103321Deity and morality, with regard to the naturalistic fallacy2104809UNINA