02896nam 2200637Ia 450 991046254240332120200520144314.01-59332-636-X(CKB)2670000000271322(EBL)1057816(OCoLC)818819098(SSID)ssj0000758384(PQKBManifestationID)12315591(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000758384(PQKBWorkID)10773866(PQKB)11298836(MiAaPQ)EBC1057816(Au-PeEL)EBL1057816(CaPaEBR)ebr10622785(EXLCZ)99267000000027132220100923d2011 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrPeer reporting of unethical police behavior[electronic resource] /Vedat KarginEl Paso LFB Scholarly Pub.c20111 online resource (182 p.)Criminal justice : recent scholarshipDescription based upon print version of record.1-59332-448-0 Includes bibliographical references and index.CONTENTS; Acknowledgements; CHAPTER ONEIntroduction; CHAPTER TWO Theories of Ethical Decision Making; CHAPTER THREE Factors Associated With Peer Reporting; CHAPTER FOUR Roadmap to Research; CHAPTER FIVE Empirical Findings; CHAPTER SIX Discussion and Implications; Appendices; References; IndexKargin examines police officers' decision making with regard to peer reporting of unethical police behavior. On a theoretical level, a peer reporting model was developed based on Rest's (1984) "four component," Trevino's (1986) "a person-situation interactionist," and, finally, Jones' (1991) "issue-contingent" models of ethical decision making for investigation of police officers' peer reporting decisions. The results suggest that the perceived seriousness of the unethical behavior is the strongest predictor of police officers' peer reporting in minor and moderate policy violations. However, oCriminal justice (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC)PolicePennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPeer reviewPennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPolice-community relationsPennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPolice misconductPennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPolice discretionPennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaElectronic books.PolicePeer reviewPolice-community relationsPolice misconductPolice discretion363.2/2Kargin Vedat1973-962716MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910462542403321Peer reporting of unethical police behavior2182931UNINA