03720nam 2200613 a 450 991046203160332120200520144314.01-4639-8626-21-4639-4952-91-4639-4099-8(CKB)2670000000184980(EBL)1606540(SSID)ssj0000941791(PQKBManifestationID)11498812(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000941791(PQKBWorkID)10964434(PQKB)11233022(MiAaPQ)EBC1606540(Au-PeEL)EBL1606540(CaPaEBR)ebr10553701(OCoLC)870244936(EXLCZ)99267000000018498020120503d2012 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrBank funding structures and risk[electronic resource] evidence from the global financial crisis /Francisco Vazquez and Pablo FedericoWashington, D.C. International Monetary Fund20121 online resource (35 p.)IMF Working PapersDescription based upon print version of record.1-4639-3314-2 Includes bibliographical references.Cover; Abstract; Contents; I. Introduction; II. Related Literature and Empirical Hypotheses; III. Data and Target Variables; A. Indicators of Bank Liquidity and Leverage; B. Global Banks Versus Domestic Banks; C. Bank Failure; IV. Empirical Approach and Quantitative Results; A. Stylized Facts; B. Baseline Regressions; C. Are There Threshold Effects at Play?; D. Are There Differences Across Bank Types?; V. Robustness Check; VI. Concluding Remarks; VII. References; Figures; 1. Evolution of Structural Liquidity and Leverage Before the Crisis, 2001-072. Evolution of Structural Liquidity and Leverage by Failed and Non-Failed Banks3. Distributions of Pre-Crisis Liquidity and Leverage across Failed and Non-Failed; Tables; 1. Stylized Balance-Sheet and Weights to Compute the NSFR; 2. Sample Coverage by Region and Type; 3. Summary Statistics of Selected Variables, 2001-07; 4. Pairwise Correlations Between Selected Variables, 2001-07; 5. Baseline Regressions; 6. Estimates of the Marginal Impact on the Probabilities of Default; 7. Probit Regressions by Sub-Samples of Liquidity and Leverage; 8. Regressions by Bank Types9. Results of Robustness Checks by Alternative Definitions of Liquidity and CapitalTable 10. Results of Robustness Checks by Sub-Components of Bank FailureThis paper analyzes the evolution of bank funding structures in the run up to the global financial crisis and studies the implications for financial stability, exploiting a bank-level dataset that covers about 11,000 banks in the U.S. and Europe during 2001?09. The results show that banks with weaker structural liquidity and higher leverage in the pre-crisis period were more likely to fail afterward. The likelihood of bank failure also increases with bank risk-taking. In the cross-section, the smaller domestically-oriented banks were relatively more vulnerable to liquidity risk, while the largIMF Working PapersGlobal Financial Crisis, 2008-2009Bank failuresDeveloped countriesElectronic books.Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009.Bank failuresVázquez Francisco F854735Federico Pablo854736MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910462031603321Bank funding structures and risk1908559UNINA