01950nam 2200565 450 991046588480332120200520144314.01-59756-940-2(CKB)3710000000749103(SSID)ssj0001692695(PQKBManifestationID)16546771(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001692695(PQKBWorkID)13169756(PQKB)25092015(MiAaPQ)EBC4591657(Au-PeEL)EBL4591657(CaPaEBR)ebr11235703(OCoLC)953662188(EXLCZ)99371000000074910320160804h20162016 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtccrEducating students with autism spectrum disorder a model for high-quality coaching /Joshua K. Harrower, PhD, BCBA-D, Louis G. Denti, PhD, Marcia Weber-Olsen, PhD, CCC-SLPSan Diego, California :Plural Publishing, Inc.,2016.©20161 online resource (265 pages)Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph1-59756-786-8 Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index.Autistic childrenEducationChildren with autism spectrum disordersEducationYouth with autism spectrum disordersEducationElectronic books.Autistic childrenEducation.Children with autism spectrum disordersEducation.Youth with autism spectrum disordersEducation.649/.154Harrower Joshua K.886139Denti LouWeber-Olsen MarciaMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910465884803321Educating students with autism spectrum disorder1978743UNINA04502nam 22006611c 450 991046119600332120200115203623.00-567-66073-71-280-57941-297866136091820-567-48497-110.5040/9780567660732(CKB)2670000000178652(EBL)894535(OCoLC)787843483(SSID)ssj0000661928(PQKBManifestationID)11404250(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000661928(PQKBWorkID)10712480(PQKB)10251781(MiAaPQ)EBC894535(Au-PeEL)EBL894535(CaPaEBR)ebr10554651(CaONFJC)MIL360918(OCoLC)1057402194(UtOrBLW)bpp09258284(EXLCZ)99267000000017865220150227d2012 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrDoctrine, dynamic and difference Pieter de WitteLondon New York T&T Clark 2012.1 online resource (273 p.)Ecclesiological investigations v. 15Description based upon print version of record.0-567-31682-3 0-567-23665-X Includes bibliographical references (pages 241-250) and index1. Introduction -- 2. The Joint Declaration on Justification: Basis Issues -- 3. Reception of Theological Advances -- 4. The Reception of Previous Dialogue Results -- 5. The Joint Declaration: A Textual Analysis -- 6. Conclusion"One of the most divisive issues in Western Christianity since the Reformation is the question of how humans are justified by God. In 1999, after many decades of ecumenical dialogue, Lutherans and Roman Catholics have declared that this issue of 'justification by faith' is no longer a cause of division between them. One of the fascinating features of this Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (JDDJ) is that it expresses a 'differentiated consensus' on justification. The method of differentiated consensus is generally regarded as an important methodological step forward in the ecumenical dialogue. It has been used and referred to in ecumenical documents published after 1999. But what are its meaning and implications? This study attempts to clarify the method of differentiated consensus by (1) investigating the process of doctrinal rapprochement which led up to the JDDJ, (2) examining the way the consensus takes shape in the document itself, (3) analyzing arguments offered by critics and advocates of the official dialogue and (4) reflecting on the concept of doctrinal difference."--Bloomsbury PublishingOne of the most divisive issues in Western Christianity since the Reformation is the question of how humans are justified by God. In 1999, after many decades of ecumenical dialogue, Lutherans and Roman Catholics have declared that this issue of 'justification by faith' is no longer a cause of division between them. One of the fascinating features of this Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (JDDJ) is that it expresses a 'differentiated consensus' on justification. The method of differentiated consensus is generally regarded as an important methodological step forward in the ecumenical dialogue. It has been used and referred to in ecumenical documents published after 1999. But what are its meaning and implications? This study attempts to clarify the method of differentiated consensus by (1) investigating the process of doctrinal rapprochement which led up to the JDDJ, (2) examining the way the consensus takes shape in the document itself, (3) analyzing arguments offered by critics and advocates of the official dialogue and (4) reflecting on the concept of doctrinal differenceEcclesiological investigations ;v. 15.Doctrine, dynamic and difference : to the heart of the Lutheran-Roman Catholic differentiated consensus on justificationJustification (Christian theology)Christian Churches & denominationsJustification (Christian theology)234.7Witte Pieter de854638UtOrBLWUtOrBLWUkLoBPBOOK9910461196003321Doctrine, dynamic and difference1908459UNINA