03650nam 2200625 450 991046085390332120180731045421.090-272-6808-8(CKB)3710000000494435(EBL)4386594(SSID)ssj0001571200(PQKBManifestationID)16221087(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001571200(PQKBWorkID)13333143(PQKB)10215273(PQKBManifestationID)14632287(PQKBWorkID)12409567(PQKB)21221729(MiAaPQ)EBC4386594(DLC) 2015029751(EXLCZ)99371000000049443520150727h20152015 uy| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrScrutinizing argumentation in practice /edited by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, University of AmsterdamAmsterdam ;Philadelphia :John Benjamins Publishing Company,[2015]©20151 online resource (353 p.)Argumentation in Context,1877-6884 ;volume 9Description based upon print version of record.90-272-1126-4 Includes bibliographical references and index.Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Foreword; PART I A general perspective applied to scientific controversies; Arguing in the Grooves; 1. Introduction; 2. Genre and language constraints; 2.1 Types of controversies and their resolution; 3. That woodpecker; 4. Arsenic-incorporating bacteria; 5. The hobbit; 6. Conclusion; References ; PART II Argumentation in a political context; Cultural differences in political debate; 1. Introduction; 2. The debates in context; 2.1 The 2010 British Prime Minister debates2.3 Argumentative acts between Pragma-dialectics and ScaPoLine3. Illustrative analysis; 3.1 Confrontation Stage coded through REPORTED-DUBITATIVE SPEECH; 3.2 Confrontation & Concluding Stage through NEGATIVE + DUBITATIVE SPEECH; 3.3 Argumentation Stage through QUOTED SPEECH; 4. Concluding; References ; A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation; 1. Introduction; 2. The implementation of pragmatic argumentation in legal justification as part of a stereotypical pattern of argumentation; 2.1 The argumentation on the first level of the main argumentation: Pragmatic argumentation2.2 The argumentation on the second and third level of the subordinate argumentation3. Exemplary analysis of the use of argumentation referring to consequences in light of the purpose of the rule in legal justification; 3.1 The justification of the applicability of the argumentation scheme of pragmatic argumentation; 4. Conclusion; References; Transparency in legal argumentation; 1. Introduction; 2. Administrative judicial decisions as a specific activity type; 3. Dutch administrative law procedure; 4. Administrative judicial decisions and the composite audience5. Addressing a compositite audienceArgumentation in context ;v. 9.Persuasion (Rhetoric)Discourse analysisElectronic books.Persuasion (Rhetoric)Discourse analysis.808Eemeren F. H. van(Frans Hendrik),1946-Garssen BartMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910460853903321Scrutinizing argumentation in practice2128816UNINA