03633nam 2200625 450 991046069960332120200520144314.00-8131-6382-X(CKB)3710000000334631(EBL)1915835(SSID)ssj0001433647(PQKBManifestationID)11897756(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001433647(PQKBWorkID)11414072(PQKB)10479191(MiAaPQ)EBC1915835(OCoLC)900345241(MdBmJHUP)muse44352(Au-PeEL)EBL1915835(CaPaEBR)ebr11005480(CaONFJC)MIL691555(EXLCZ)99371000000033463120150121h19671967 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrForeign seizures Sabbatino and the act of state doctrine /by Eugene F. Mooney[Lexington, Kentucky] :University of Kentucky Press,1967.©19671 online resource (191 p.)University of Kentucky StudyIncludes index.1-322-60273-5 0-8131-5366-2 Bibliography: p. [161]-164.Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; INTRODUCTION; 1. GENESIS OF THE ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE; 2. SOUTH AMERICAN SEIZURES; The Sovereign Immunity Theme; The International Full Faith and Credit Theme; The Rule for Decision Theme; Overriding National Policy; 3. EUROPEAN SEIZURES; Communist Extraterritorial Confiscations; Early Soviet Seizures; Soviet Seizures since Diplomatic Recognition; West European-Nazi Seizures; The Nazi Seizures; The Bernstein Affair; 4. THE SABBATINO CASE; Precipitating Events; The Lower Court Decisions; The Supreme Court Decision; Justice White's DissentAnalytical Comparison of the Majority Minority Opinions5. SABBATINO AFTERMATH; Constitutional Problems; Legislature versus Judiciary-the Hickenlooper Amendment; Congress' ""Foreign Affairs"" Power; Congress' Power over Federal Courts; Modes of International Claims Settlements; 6. A NEW JUDICIAL POLICY BASIS; American Foreign Policy; American Pattern of Private Foreign Investment; Stock and Flow; Direction; Redirection after Castro; CODA; APPENDIXES; I. A Bibliography of Scholarly Comment on the Act of State Doctrine, the Sabbatino Case, and the Hickenlooper AmendmentII. International Pattern of Application of the Act of State DoctrineTABLE OF CASES; INDEX; A; B; C; D; E; F; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; V; WThe United States Supreme Court framed a unique legal doctrine on foreign seizure of American-owned property in the case of Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino in 1963. This ruling has far-reaching implications for international law, American foreign policy, and the role of the Court in both domestic and international arenas of power. Disagreeing with the Court's decisions, Eugene F. Mooney undertakes to place the Act of State Doctrine in its proper historical, jurisprudential, and political perspective.Mooney argues forcefully that the dogmatic application of the Act of State Doctrine is indEminent domain (International law)Act of stateElectronic books.Eminent domain (International law)Act of state.341.5/9Mooney Eugene F.282135MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910460699603321Foreign seizures673034UNINA