03102oam 2200649I 450 991045948940332120200520144314.01-136-89617-11-136-89618-X1-282-88588-X97866128858840-203-84107-710.4324/9780203841075 (CKB)2670000000051690(EBL)574570(OCoLC)670411143(SSID)ssj0000427604(PQKBManifestationID)11283908(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000427604(PQKBWorkID)10406685(PQKB)11270922(MiAaPQ)EBC574570(Au-PeEL)EBL574570(CaPaEBR)ebr10422096(CaONFJC)MIL288588(OCoLC)671809029(EXLCZ)99267000000005169020180706d2011 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrSandplay therapy research and practice /Grace HongNew York :Routledge,2011.1 online resource (220 p.)"First published in Chinese in 2007."0-415-57052-2 0-415-57051-4 Includes bibliographical references and index.Book Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Figures; Foreword by Katherine Bradway; Foreword by Chi Hui Jung; Foreword by Barbara Weller; Acknowledgments; Introduction; Part I: Research conducted in the United States; Chapter 1: Introduction; Chapter 2: Literature review; Chapter 3: Method; Chapter 4: Results and discussion; Chapter 5: Conclusion; Part II: The author's sandplay case done in the United States; Chapter 6: Introduction of the case; Chapter 7: Zana's sandplay process: Recovery from sexual trauma; Chapter 8: Summary; Part III: Study of the symbolChapter 9: Importance of symbol in sandplay therapyChapter 10: Study of the dragon as a symbol; Part IV: The author's sandplay research done in Taiwan; Chapter 11: Introduction; Chapter 12: The sandplay outcome study of twelve professional mental health workers; Part V: The author's sandplay case done in Taiwan; Chapter 13: Introduction of the case; Chapter 14: Jade's sandplay rebirth process: From darkness to light; Chapter 15: Summary; Appendix; References; IndexThis book explores the essence of sandplay therapy. Drawing on Grace Hong's extensive work in the field the book discusses this unique, creative and nonverbal approach to therapy. The book focuses on her experiences in practice, research and teaching from both the US and Taiwan. SandplayTherapeutic usePlay therapyHandbooks, manuals, etcElectronic books.SandplayTherapeutic use.Play therapy616.89/1653Hong Grace1942-,934560MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910459489403321Sandplay therapy2104464UNINA05331nam 2200649 450 991078776270332120230803032025.090-272-7097-X(CKB)2670000000495838(EBL)1577465(SSID)ssj0001060535(PQKBManifestationID)11985593(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001060535(PQKBWorkID)11087494(PQKB)10824394(MiAaPQ)EBC1577465(Au-PeEL)EBL1577465(CaPaEBR)ebr10818036(CaONFJC)MIL550927(OCoLC)865334295(EXLCZ)99267000000049583820130913d2013 uy| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrAdvances in frame semantics /edited by Mirjam Fried, Charles University, Kiki Nikiforidou, University of AthensAmsterdam :John Benjamins Publishing Company,[2013]©20131 online resource (215 p.)Benjamins Current Topics,1874-0081 ;volume 58Description based upon print version of record.90-272-0277-X Includes bibliographical references and index.Advances in Frame Semantics; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Advances in Frame Semantics; References; Verbs of visual perception in Italian FrameNet; 1. Introduction; 2. Data and methodology; 2.1 Verbs of visual perception; 2.2 The Italian FrameNet methodology; 2.3 Sentence sampling; 2.3.1 Preliminary scanning; 2.3.2 Analyzing syntactic frame distribution; 2.3.3 Analyzing filler distribution; 2.4 Encoding and annotation; 3. Analysis of verbs of visual perception; 3.1 Assigning frames to LUs; 3.2 Frame Element structure3.3 Splitting Perception_active into two subframes4. Conclusions; 4.1 Results; 4.2 Further developments: A distributional approach to Frame Semantics; References; Semantic annotation of Italian legal texts; 1. Introduction; 2. Related work; 2.1 FrameNet-based semantic annotation of domain-specific corpora; 2.2 Semantic annotation of legal text corpora; 3. Starting points; 3.1 The Italian Environmental legal corpus; 3.2 Issues in legal language description; 3.3 Issues of Legal Knowledge Representation; 4. Annotation methodology; 4.1 The syntactic level of annotation4.2 Lexicographic or full-text annotation?4.3 Domain-specific customization issues; 5. First results of pilot annotation trial; 6. Conclusion and future developments; References; Frames and the experiential basis of the Moving Time metaphor; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Temporal concepts; 1.2 The conceptual metaphor theory of Lakoff & Johnson (1980); 1.3 Experiential basis; 1.3.1 Experiential basis and frames; 2. The experiential basis of the Moving Ego metaphor; 3. The experiential basis of the Moving Time metaphor; 3.1 An apparent paradox; 3.1.1 The solution to the apparent paradox3.1.2 Another apparent problem3.2 Expectation of arrival at ego's location; 3.2.1 Other submappings and deictic structure; 3.2.2 Application to Moving Ego; 4. Summary and conclusions; References; FrameNet as a resource for paraphrase research; 1. Introduction; 2. Frames and frame elements; 3. Features of the FrameNet database relevant to paraphrase research; 4. Paraphrase by intersubstitutability of synonymous expressions; 5. Frame relations; 5.1 Paraphrase by inheritance; 5.2 Paraphrase by perspective alternations; 5.3 Paraphrase by isolating causation; 5.4 Paraphrase by isolating inchoation6. Paraphrase using grammatical information available in FrameNet6.1 Support constructions; 6.2 Valence choice by phrase type; 6.3 Voice alternation; 6.4 Paraphrase by complement type alternations; 6.5 Paraphrase by ditransitive alternations; 6.6 Paraphrase by reciprocal alternation; 7. Constructions; 7.1 Paraphrase by licensed omission; 7.2 Extra-thematic adjunction; 8. Negatively-defined antonym; 8.1 Symmetric antonymy; 8.2 Asymmetric antonymy; 9. Conclusions; References; A frame-based approach to connectives; 1. Introduction; 2. Frame semantics and FrameNet; 2.1 Frame semantics2.2 FrameNetConstruction grammarians are still quite reluctant to extend their descriptions to units beyond the sentence. However, the theoretical premises of construction grammar and frame semantics are particularly suited to cover spoken interaction from a cognitive perspective. Furthermore, as construction grammar is anchored in the cognitive linguistics paradigm and as such subscribes to meaning being grounded in experience, it needs to consider interaction since grammatical structures may be grounded not only in sensory-motor, but also in social-interactive experience. The example of grounded languagBenjamins current topics ;v. 58.SemanticsLexicologySemantics.Lexicology.415Fried Mirjam1481832Nikiforidou Kiki1961-1481833MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910787762703321Advances in frame semantics3699083UNINA