02852nam 22006131c 450 991045936140332120200115203623.00-567-66067-21-282-86787-397866128678730-567-05926-X10.5040/9780567660671(CKB)2670000000054861(EBL)601890(OCoLC)676697668(SSID)ssj0000431032(PQKBManifestationID)11303126(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000431032(PQKBWorkID)10456507(PQKB)11788886(MiAaPQ)EBC601890(Au-PeEL)EBL601890(CaPaEBR)ebr10427406(CaONFJC)MIL286787(OCoLC)893335045(UtOrBLW)bpp09258014(EXLCZ)99267000000005486120150227d2009 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrWhat's wrong with sin? sin in individual and social perspective from Schleiermacher to theologies of liberation Derek R. NelsonLondon New York T & T Clark 2009.1 online resource (224 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-567-06713-0 0-567-26676-1 Includes bibliographical references (pages [189]-206) and indexChapter I: Introduction -- Part I: Nineteenth Century Typology -- Chapter II: Ritschl's Critique of Schleiermacher on Individual Sin -- Chapter III: Finney and Nevin on Individual and Social Sin -- Part II: Twentieth Century Application -- Chapter IV: Individual and Social Sin in Selected Latin American Theologies -- Chapter V: Individual and Social Sin in Selected Feminist Theologies -- Chapter VI: Individual and Social Sin in Selected Asian Theologies -- Chapter VII: Conclusion -- The 20th century witnessed a vast proliferation of conceptions of sin in Christian thought. One hallmark thereof has been an increased emphasis on the non-individualistic dimensions of human sin. It is suggested here that there have been two primary types of rejections of individualism in doctrines of sin in the last half-century, the "structural sin" type and the "relational self" type. The book concludes with recommendations drawn from the preceding analyses for further understanding of the social dimensions of sin: the need for clarifying the agential status of a "social structure;" theSinChristian theologySin.202.2Nelson Derek R.981130UtOrBLWUtOrBLWUkLoBPBOOK9910459361403321What's wrong with sin2239359UNINA