03824nam 2200625Ia 450 991045913890332120200520144314.01-282-60793-697866126079361-4008-2618-710.1515/9781400826186(CKB)2670000000028553(EBL)537651(OCoLC)700686802(SSID)ssj0000433707(PQKBManifestationID)11311337(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000433707(PQKBWorkID)10390903(PQKB)10240773(MiAaPQ)EBC537651(DE-B1597)446449(OCoLC)1004871999(DE-B1597)9781400826186(PPN)199244685(Au-PeEL)EBL537651(CaPaEBR)ebr10394777(CaONFJC)MIL260793(EXLCZ)99267000000002855320030430d2004 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe birth of model theory[electronic resource] Löwenheim's theorem in the frame of the theory of relatives /Calixto Badesa ; translated by Michael Maudsley ; revised by the authorCourse BookPrinceton, N.J. ;Oxford Princeton University Pressc20041 online resource (255 pages)Description based upon print version of record.0-691-05853-9 Includes bibliographical references and index. Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Chapter 1. Algebra of Classes and Propositional Calculus -- Chapter 2. The Theory of Relatives -- Chapter 3. Changing the Order of Quantifiers -- Chapter 4. The Löwenheim Normal Form -- Chapter 5. Preliminaries to Löwenheim's Theorem -- Chapter 6. Löwenheim's Theorem -- Appendix. First-Order Logic with Fleeing Indices -- References -- IndexLöwenheim's theorem reflects a critical point in the history of mathematical logic, for it marks the birth of model theory--that is, the part of logic that concerns the relationship between formal theories and their models. However, while the original proofs of other, comparably significant theorems are well understood, this is not the case with Löwenheim's theorem. For example, the very result that scholars attribute to Löwenheim today is not the one that Skolem--a logician raised in the algebraic tradition, like Löwenheim--appears to have attributed to him. In The Birth of Model Theory, Calixto Badesa provides both the first sustained, book-length analysis of Löwenheim's proof and a detailed description of the theoretical framework--and, in particular, of the algebraic tradition--that made the theorem possible. Badesa's three main conclusions amount to a completely new interpretation of the proof, one that sharply contradicts the core of modern scholarship on the topic. First, Löwenheim did not use an infinitary language to prove his theorem; second, the functional interpretation of Löwenheim's normal form is anachronistic, and inappropriate for reconstructing the proof; and third, Löwenheim did not aim to prove the theorem's weakest version but the stronger version Skolem attributed to him. This book will be of considerable interest to historians of logic, logicians, philosophers of logic, and philosophers of mathematics.Logic, Symbolic and mathematicalElectronic books.Logic, Symbolic and mathematical.511.3092Badesa Calixto726359MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910459138903321The birth of model theory2458610UNINA