03594nam 2200661 a 450 991045867220332120200520144314.01-282-79658-597866127965860-231-52097-210.7312/hols15042(CKB)2560000000050157(EBL)908622(OCoLC)828795474(SSID)ssj0000434388(PQKBManifestationID)12147147(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000434388(PQKBWorkID)10402488(PQKB)10638633(MiAaPQ)EBC908622(DE-B1597)458945(OCoLC)1013944528(OCoLC)979683089(DE-B1597)9780231520973(Au-PeEL)EBL908622(CaPaEBR)ebr10419575(CaONFJC)MIL279658(EXLCZ)99256000000005015720090722d2010 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrChina and India[electronic resource] prospects for peace /Jonathan HolslagNew York Columbia University Pressc20101 online resource (221 p.)Contemporary Asia in the worldDescription based upon print version of record.0-231-15042-3 Includes bibliographical references and index.Sino-Indian rivalry in an era of globalization -- Emerging trading states -- The evolution of Sino-Indian relations -- Ricardo's reality -- Shifting perceptions -- The military security dilemma -- Regional security cooperation.For all their spectacular growth, China and India must still lift a hundred million citizens out of poverty and create jobs for the numerous laborers. Both powers hope trade and investment will sustain national unity. For the first time, Jonathan Holslag identifies these objectives as new sources of rivalry and argues that China and India cannot grow without fierce contest.Though he recognizes that both countries wish to maintain stable relations, Holslag argues that success in implementing economic reform will give way to conflict. This rivalry is already tangible in Asia as a whole, where shifting patterns of economic influence have altered the balance of power and have led to shortsighted policies that undermine regional stability. Holslag also demonstrates that despite two decades of peace, mutual perceptions have become hostile, and a military game of tit-for-tat promises to diminish prospects for peace. Holslag therefore refutes the notion that development and interdependence lead to peace, and he does so by embedding rich empirical evidence within broader debates on international relations theory. His book is down-to-earth and realistic while also taking into account the complexities of internal policymaking. The result is a fascinating portrait of the complicated interaction among economic, political, military, and perceptional levels of diplomacy.Contemporary Asia in the world.POLITICAL SCIENCE / International Relations / GeneralbisacshChinaRelationsIndiaIndiaRelationsChinaElectronic books.POLITICAL SCIENCE / International Relations / General.327.51054Holslag Jonathan770083MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910458672203321China and India2491369UNINA04384oam 2200709 450 991082691400332120230725062958.09780719095030 (ebook)0-7190-9503-4(CKB)3710000000870186(MiAaPQ)EBC4705538993710000000870186(DE-B1597)658799(DE-B1597)9780719095030(EXLCZ)99371000000087018620161013h20102010 uy 0engurcnu||||||||rdacontentrdamediardacarrierPockets of resistance British news media, war and theory in the 2003 invasion of Iraq /Piers Robinson [and four others]Manchester, [England] :Manchester University Press,2010.©20101 online resource (225 pages) illustrations, tables0-7190-8158-0 0-7190-8445-8 Includes bibliographical references and index.Frontmatter -- Contents -- List of tables and figures -- Preface and acknowledgements -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Mobilising for battle: The news media and war from Vietnam to Iraq -- 3 Theorising and analysing media performance in wartime -- 4 Placing coverage of the invasion in context -- 5 ‘Supporting our boys in battle’: Evidence for supportive coverage and the elite-driven model -- 6 ‘Independence, diversity and professional autonomy’: Evidence for negotiated and oppositional coverage -- 7 Case studies from the invasion of Iraq: Jessica Lynch, Ali Abbas and the anti-war movement -- 8 Conclusion: Patterns of support, negotiation and opposition -- Appendix A: Further information about the content and framing analysis -- Appendix B: Examples of the detailed criteria provided to coders for assessing thematic frames -- Bibliography -- IndexFor scholars of media and war, the 2003 invasion of Iraq is a compelling case to study. As part of President Bush’s ‘war on terror’, the invasion was the most controversial British foreign policy decision since Suez, and its ramifications and aftermath have rarely been far from the news. In the many political and public debates regarding this conflict, arguments over the role of the media have been omnipresent. For some, media coverage was biased against the war, for others it became a cheerleader for the invasion. Where does the truth lie? Drawing upon a uniquely-detailed and rich content and framing analysis of television and press coverage, and on interviews with some of the journalists involved, Pockets of Resistance provides an authoritative assessment of how British news media reported the 2003 Iraq invasion and also of the theoretical implications of this case for our understanding of wartime media-state relations. Pockets of Resistance examines the successes and failures of British television news as it sought to attain independence under the difficult circumstances of war, and describes and explains the emergence of some surprisingly vociferous anti-war voices within a diverse national press.Iraq War, 2003-2011Mass media and the warMass mediaGreat BritainTelevision broadcasting of newsGreat BritainHistory21st centuryAli Abbas.British news media.Iraq invasion.Jessica Lynch.anti-war movement.civilian casualties.elite-driven model.foreign policy.humanitarian operations.independent model.media criticism.military casualties.oppositional coverage.oppositional model.supportive coverage.wartime media performance.Iraq War, 2003-2011Mass media and the war.Mass mediaTelevision broadcasting of newsHistory070.44995670443Robinson Piers, authttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1515716Robinson PiersMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910826914003321Pockets of resistance4001984UNINA