03820nam 2200685 a 450 991045850010332120200520144314.00-8147-5957-20-8147-9612-510.18574/9780814759578(CKB)2560000000014584(EBL)865698(OCoLC)779828197(SSID)ssj0000428121(PQKBManifestationID)11283033(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000428121(PQKBWorkID)10414133(PQKB)10679060(MiAaPQ)EBC865698(OCoLC)642206719(MdBmJHUP)muse4850(DE-B1597)548261(DE-B1597)9780814759578(Au-PeEL)EBL865698(CaPaEBR)ebr10389926(EXLCZ)99256000000001458420100113d2010 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrThe shock of the news[electronic resource] media coverage and the making of 9/11 /Brian A. MonahanNew York New York University Pressc20101 online resource (238 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-8147-9555-2 0-8147-9554-4 Includes bibliographical references and index.Introduction : understanding public drama -- News as public drama : the era of the endless news cycle -- Making public drama : telling a good story -- Framing September 11 : overview of media and audience response -- Seeking sense amid the shock : the coverage on September 11 -- What has been and what will be : dramatic amplification at ground zero -- This is your story, too : cultivating emotionality at ground zero -- America's heroes : New York firefighters in the spotlight -- To the stars go the spoils : moral currency and the FDNY -- September 11 and beyond : public drama in the twenty-first century.How did the events of September 11, 2001 come to be thought of as 9/11? The Shock of the News is an authoritative account of post-9/11 political and social processes, offering an in-depth analysis of the media coverage of this momentous event. Brian Monahan demonstrates how 9/11 has been transformed into a morality tale centered on patriotism, victimization, and heroes.Introducing the idea of “public drama” as a way of making sense of how media processed and packaged the 9/11 attacks for their audiences, Monahan not only illuminates how and why the coverage took shape as it did, but also provides us with new insights into the social, cultural, and political consequences of the attacks and their aftermath. Monahan explains how and why 9/11 became such a potent symbol, exploring how meanings and symbols get created, reinforced, and disseminated in modern society. Ultimately, Monahan offers an important new understanding of this singular event of our time, and his compelling narrative brings the momentous events back into focus.September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001Press coverageSeptember 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001, in mass mediaTerrorismPress coverageUnited StatesTerrorism in mass mediaUnited StatesElectronic books.September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001Press coverage.September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001, in mass media.TerrorismPress coverageTerrorism in mass media973.931AP 16850rvkMonahan Brian A1042302MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910458500103321The shock of the news2466441UNINA03088nam 2200325 450 991072501550332120230704055405.0(CKB)5470000002601339(NjHacI)995470000002601339(EXLCZ)99547000000260133920230704d2019 uy 0freur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierBiais, hiatus et absences en archéologie [actes de la 12e journée doctorale d'archéologie, Paris, 17 mai 2017] /Elisa Caron-Laviolette [and three others]Paris :Éditions de la Sorbonne,2019.1 online resourceL'archéologie est communément distinguée des autres sciences humaines, en particulier des sciences du passé, par son objet d'étude qui est, par essence, l'homme à travers les vestiges matériels, de l'objet jusqu'au site archéologique et son environnement. Mais alors que ces restes tangibles des sociétés passées sont descriptibles, caractérisables, classables dans des typologies, comment aborder et interpréter les vides et les silences documentaires qui n'ont pas laissé de traces manifestes ? La problématique de l'absence est commune à toutes les approches archéologiques et à toutes les aires chronoculturelles. Dans les articles de ce volume, issus de communications présentées lors de la 12e Journée Doctorale d'archéologie de l'université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (ED 112), les doctorants tentent, à travers des indices indirects, de définir, de mesurer, d'expliquer ces vides et ces silences, voire de les combler. Face à la nature incomplète ou biaisée des sources archéologiques, des solutions méthodologiques sont proposées et appliquées à des problématiques et à des contextes variés, à la faveur d'approches croisées, multidimensionnelles et multiscalaires. Archaeology is usually distinguished from other human sciences (especially these concerning the past) on behalf of its subject: man through material remains, from the scale of a single object to that of the archaeological site and its environment. But while these tangible remains of past societies are describable, characterizable and able to be classified in typologies, we are left to wonder: how do we address and interpret voids and documentary silences that did not leave any patent trace? The problematics of absence is a shared concern among all archaeological approaches and all time periods. In this volume's papers, issued from oral presentations held during the 12th Journée Doctorale d'archéologie of the Paris Panthéon Sorbonne University (ED 112), PhD candidates attempt, through indirect clues, to define.ArchaeologyArchaeology.930.1Caron-Laviolette Elisa1365441NjHacINjHaclBOOK9910725015503321Biais, hiatus et absences en archéologie3394938UNINA