03989nam 2200625 a 450 991045765940332120210504234227.00-8147-6246-80-8147-6245-X10.18574/9780814762455(CKB)2550000000074129(EBL)866186(OCoLC)772593022(SSID)ssj0000639146(PQKBManifestationID)11380535(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000639146(PQKBWorkID)10617236(PQKB)10750069(StDuBDS)EDZ0001374935(MiAaPQ)EBC866186(OCoLC)858699883(MdBmJHUP)muse19842(DE-B1597)548115(DE-B1597)9780814762455(Au-PeEL)EBL866186(CaPaEBR)ebr10519772(EXLCZ)99255000000007412920110701d2012 uy 0engur|||||||nn|ntxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierNo undocumented child left behind[electronic resource] Plyler v. Doe and the education of undocumented schoolchildren /Michael A. OlivasNew York New York University Pressc20121 online resource (xiii, 193 pages)Citizenship and migration in the AmericasDescription based upon print version of record.0-8147-6244-1 Includes bibliographical references and index.Why Plyler matters -- The story of Plyler v. Doe : the education of undocumented children, and the polity -- The implementation of Plyler v. Doe -- The political economy of the Dream Act and the legislative process : Doe goes to college -- Conclusion : the danger and the discourse (or, why Plyler should have been decided upon preemption grounds).The 1982 U. S. Supreme Court case of Plyler v. Doe, which made it possible for undocumented children to enroll in Texas public schools, was a watershed moment for immigrant rights in the United States. The Court struck down both a state statute denying funding for education to undocumented children and a municipal school district's attempt to charge an annual,000 tuition fee for each undocumented student to compensate for the lost state funding. Yet while this case has not returned to the Supreme Court, it is frequently contested at the state and local level.In No Undocumented Child Left Behind, Michael A. Olivas tells a fascinating history of the landmark case, examining how, 30 years later, Plyler v. Doe continues to suffer from implementation issues and requires additional litigation and vigilance to enforce the ruling. He takes a comprehensive look at the legal regime it established regarding the education of undocumented school children, moves up through its implementation, including direct and indirect attacks on it, and closes with the ongoing, highly charged debates over the Development, Relief, and Education for Minors (DREAM) Act, which aims to give conditional citizenship to undocumented college students who graduated from US high schools and have been in the country for at least five years. Listen to Michael Olivas on WYPF 88.1 FM, as he takes a look back 30 years to the Supreme Court case that made it possible for undocumented children to enroll in public schools and the highly-charged political and legal battles that have ensued.Citizenship and migration in the Americas.Children of undocumented immigrantsEducationLaw and legislationUnited StatesElectronic books.Children of undocumented immigrantsEducationLaw and legislation344.73/0791Olivas Michael A920109MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910457659403321No undocumented child left behind2460537UNINA