04684nam 22006495 450 991045747600332120210528170039.01-283-21194-797866132119410-8122-0310-010.9783/9780812203103(CKB)2550000000050866(OCoLC)759158238(CaPaEBR)ebrary10491990(SSID)ssj0000646901(PQKBManifestationID)11435712(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000646901(PQKBWorkID)10589356(PQKB)11429857(DE-B1597)449175(OCoLC)979591620(DE-B1597)9780812203103(MiAaPQ)EBC3441533(EXLCZ)99255000000005086620190708d2013 fg engur|||---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierA natural history of the romance novel /Pamela RegisPhiladelphia :University of Pennsylvania Press,[2013]©20031 online resource (xiii, 224 pages)Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-8122-1522-2 Includes bibliographical references (pages 209-218) and index.Frontmatter --Contents --Preface: The Most Popular, Least Respected Literary Genre --Part I. Critics And The Romance Novel --1 The Romance Novel And Women'S Bondage --2 In Defense Of The Romance Novel --Part II. The Romance Novel Defined --3 The Definition --4 The Definition Expanded --5 The Genre'S Limits --Part III. The Romance Novel, 1740-1908 --6 Writing The Romance Novel'S History --7. The First Best Seller: Pamela, 1740 --8 The Best Romance Novel Ever Written: Pride And Prejudice, 1813 --9 Freedom And Rochester: Jane Eyre, 1847 --10 The Romance Form In The Victorian Multiplot Novel: Framley Parsonage, 1861 --11 The Ideal Romance Novel: A Room With A View, 1908 --Part IV. The Twentieth-Century Romance Novel --12 The Popular Romance Novel In The Twentieth Century --13 Civil Contracts: Georgette Heyer --14 Courtship And Suspense: Mary Stewart --15 Harlequin, Silhouette, And The Americanization Of The Popular Romance Novel: Janet Dailey --16 Dangerous Men: Jayne Ann Krentz --17 One Man, One Woman: Nora Roberts --Conclusion --Works Cited --Index --AcknowledgmentsThe romance novel has the strange distinction of being the most popular but least respected of literary genres. While it remains consistently dominant in bookstores and on best-seller lists, it is also widely dismissed by the critical community. Scholars have alleged that romance novels help create subservient readers, who are largely women, by confining heroines to stories that ignore issues other than love and marriage.Pamela Regis argues that such critical studies fail to take into consideration the personal choice of readers, offer any true definition of the romance novel, or discuss the nature and scope of the genre. Presenting the counterclaim that the romance novel does not enslave women but, on the contrary, is about celebrating freedom and joy, Regis offers a definition that provides critics with an expanded vocabulary for discussing a genre that is both classic and contemporary, sexy and entertaining.Taking the stance that the popular romance novel is a work of literature with a brilliant pedigree, Regis asserts that it is also a very old, stable form. She traces the literary history of the romance novel from canonical works such as Richardson's Pamela through Austen's Pride and Prejudice, Brontë's Jane Eyre, and E. M. Hull's The Sheik, and then turns to more contemporary works such as the novels of Georgette Heyer, Mary Stewart, Janet Dailey, Jayne Ann Krentz, and Nora Roberts.Romance fiction, EnglishHistory and criticismRomance fiction, AmericanHistory and criticismPopular literatureEnglish-speaking countriesHistory and criticismFICTIONbisacRomance / Historical / GeneralbisacRomance fiction, EnglishHistory and criticism.Romance fiction, AmericanHistory and criticism.Popular literatureHistory and criticism.FICTIONRomance / Historical / General823/.08509Regis Pamela596054DE-B1597DE-B1597BOOK9910457476003321A natural history of the romance novel2454554UNINA