02837oam 2200637I 450 991045590070332120200520144314.01-135-63078-X1-135-63079-81-283-24125-097866132412521-4106-0963-410.4324/9781410609632 (CKB)111087027890024(EBL)335488(OCoLC)476147593(SSID)ssj0000158110(PQKBManifestationID)11153039(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000158110(PQKBWorkID)10147182(PQKB)11597843(MiAaPQ)EBC335488(Au-PeEL)EBL335488(CaPaEBR)ebr10227449(CaONFJC)MIL324125(OCoLC)53983154(EXLCZ)9911108702789002420180706d2004 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrFree press vs. fair trials examining publicity's role in trial outcomes /Jon Bruschke, William E. LogesMahwah, N.J. :Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,2004.1 online resource (208 p.)LEA's communication seriesDescription based upon print version of record.0-8058-5703-6 0-8058-4325-6 Includes bibliographical references (p. 165-173) and indexes.Book Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Foreword; Preface; Chapter One Introduction; Chapter Two What We Think We Know; Chapter Three Field Research; Chapter Four Pretrial Publicity and Media Theory: "General" Publicity Revisited; Chapter Five Conclusions; Appendix: Detailed Discussion of City-Level Data; References; Author Index; Subject IndexCurrent research on media and the law has generally been atheoretical and contradictory. This volume explains why pretrial publicity is unlikely to affect the outcome of most jury trials, despite many experimental studies claiming to show the influence of publicity. It reviews existing literature on the topic and includes results from the authors' own research in an effort to answer four questions: *Does pretrial publicity bias the outcome of trials? *If it has an effect, under what conditions does this effect emerge? *What remedies should courts apply in situations wheLEA's communication series.Free press and fair trialUnited StatesElectronic books.Free press and fair trial345.73/07Bruschke Jon.933347Loges William E933348FlBoTFGFlBoTFGBOOK9910455900703321Free press vs. fair trials2101203UNINA