02625oam 2200601I 450 991045520590332120200520144314.01-134-55528-81-280-04981-20-203-46998-40-203-24372-210.4324/9780203469989 (CKB)111056485546436(EBL)167092(OCoLC)52121054(SSID)ssj0000210414(PQKBManifestationID)11180266(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000210414(PQKBWorkID)10291064(PQKB)10180719(MiAaPQ)EBC167092(Au-PeEL)EBL167092(CaPaEBR)ebr10054206(CaONFJC)MIL4981(EXLCZ)9911105648554643620180706d2000 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrThe new Hume debate /edited by Rupert Read and Kenneth A. RichmanLondon ;New York :Routledge,2000.1 online resource (223 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-415-39975-0 0-415-23884-6 Includes bibliographical references (p. [198]-203) and index.Book Cover; Title; Contents; Notes on contributors; Preface; Acknowledgements and permissions; Reference notes; Introduction; 'Gilding or staining' the world with 'sentiments' and 'phantasms'; David Hume: Objects and power; The New Hume*; Hume's causal realism: recovering a traditional interpretation; Hume and thick connexions*; Hume on causality: projectivist and realist?; Sceptical doubts concerning Hume's causal realism; Relative ideas re-viewed; From cognitive science to a post-Cartesian text: what did Hume really say?In closing: The new antagonists of 'the New Hume': on the relevance of Goodman and Wittgenstein to the New Hume debate Bibliography; Citation index; Name index; Subject indexIncluding new essays by renowned philosophers and Hume scholars such as Barry Stround, Simon Blackburn and Galen Strawson, this is the first book to discuss the whole debate about whether Hume was indeed a sceptic.Philosophy, ScottishElectronic books.Philosophy, Scottish.192Read Rupert J.1966-861978Richman Kenneth A.1966-979125FlBoTFGFlBoTFGBOOK9910455205903321The new Hume debate2232020UNINA