07703nam 22006851c 450 991045482880332120200115203623.01-4725-6046-91-282-38800-297866123880021-84731-507-010.5040/9781472560469(CKB)1000000000806654(EBL)479803(OCoLC)507435934(SSID)ssj0000335666(PQKBManifestationID)12061745(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000335666(PQKBWorkID)10277130(PQKB)10464835(MiAaPQ)EBC1772595(MiAaPQ)EBC479803(UtOrBLW)bpp09256074(Au-PeEL)EBL479803(EXLCZ)99100000000080665420140929d2009 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrThe change of position defence Elise Bant1st ed.Oxford Portland, Oregon Hart Publishing 2009.1 online resource (292 p.)Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Oxford, 20081-84113-965-3 Includes bibliographical references and index1. Introduction and Overview -- A Introduction -- B The Change of Position Defence -- (1) A Core Case -- (2) The Four Main Areas of Doubt -- (a) The Reliance Issue -- (b) The Fault Issue -- (c) The Ambit of Operation Issue -- (d) The Rationale Issue -- C Underlying Assumptions -- (1) Introduction -- (2) The Nature of Unjust Enrichment -- (3) Restitution and Unjust Enrichment -- (4) A Fusionist Approach -- D Methodology and Overview -- (1) Introduction -- (2) Part One-Foundations -- (3) Part Two-Definition -- (4) Part Three-Ramifications -- Part One: Foundations -- 2. Lessons from Estoppel by Representation -- A Introduction -- B Elements of Estoppel by Representation -- (1) Representation -- (2) Reliance -- (a) The Meaning of Reliance -- (b) The Role of Reliance as a Causal Requirement -- (c) The Applicable Test of Causation -- (d) Proving Reliance -- (e) A Residual, Evidential Role for the 'But For' Test. -- (f) The Normative Significance of Reliance -- (g) Lessons for the Change of Position Defence -- (3) The 'Reasonableness' Requirement -- (a) The Defendant's Reliance must be Reasonable -- (b) The Standard of Reasonableness and its Relationship to Good Faith -- (c) The Function of the Reasonableness Requirement -- (d) Lessons for the Change of Position Defence -- (4) Detriment -- (a) The Meaning of Detriment -- (b) The Time for Assessing the Detrimental Change of Position -- (c) Detrimental Changes of Position include Omissions and Non-pecuniary Changes -- (d) The Change of Position must be Irreversible -- (e) Lessons for the Change of Position Defence -- C Bars to the Defence -- (1) Defendant at Fault in Inducing the Representation -- (2) Defendant in Breach of Duty -- (3) Illegality -- D Conclusion -- 3. Lessons from the Defence of Payment Over by an Agent -- A Introduction -- B The Requirement of Payment Over -- C Notice -- D Bars to the Defence -- E Conclusion -- 4. Lessons from Rescission -- A Introduction -- B Restitutio in Integrum -- (1) Rescission and the Requirement of Restitutio in Integrum -- (2) The Requirement of Counter-restitution -- (a) Rationale -- (b) Elements and Operation -- (c) Application of the Two Claims Approach to Rescission Cases -- (3) The Defendant's Changes of Position -- (a) Change by Exchange -- (b) Independent Changes in the Received Benefit -- (c) Defendant-instigated Changes of Position -- (4) The Claimant's Changes of Position -- (a) Independent Changes in the Received Benefit -- (b) Claimant-instigated Changes of Position -- (c) An Irreconcilable Tension? -- C Conclusion -- (1) Rationale -- (2) Elements -- (3) Ambit of Operation -- Part Two: Definition -- 5. Primary Elements -- A Introduction -- B Elements -- (1) A Detrimental Change of Position -- (a) Detriment as 'Disenrichment' -- (b) Detriment as 'Irreversibility' -- (c) The Irreversibility Approach is to be Preferred -- (d) Proving the Irreversible Change of Position -- (2) Causation -- (a) Introduction -- (b) But-for Causation in Cases of Independent Changes of Position -- (c) Good Faith in Cases of Independent Changes of Position -- (d) Reliance in Cases of Defendant-instigated Changes of Position -- (e) Reliance must be Reasonable -- (f) Anticipatory Changes of Position -- (g) Proving Causation -- (3) The Impact of Third Parties -- C Conclusion -- 6. Fault as a Bar to the Defence -- A Introduction -- B Wrongdoers -- C Duress and Undue Influence -- D The Innocent Inducer -- E Illegality and Legal Stultification -- F Fault in the Defendant's Change of Position -- G Conclusion -- 7. Ambit of Operation -- A Introduction -- B Application to Claims in Unjust Enrichment -- (1) Mistake -- (2) Duress and Undue Influence -- (3) Failure of Consideration -- (4) No Intention to Benefit -- (5) Policy-motivated Unjust Factors -- (6) Cases of Proprietary Restitution -- C Application to Claims outside Unjust Enrichment -- D Conclusion -- 8. Rationale -- A Introduction -- B Disenrichment -- C Autonomy -- D Security of Receipt -- E A Harm-based Rationale -- F A Mixed Rationale of Protection and Prophylaxis -- G Conclusion -- 9. Conclusion -- Part Three: Ramifications -- 10. Ramifications -- A Introduction -- B Estoppel by Representation -- C Payment Over and Ministerial Receipt -- D Restitutio in Integrum -- E Good Consideration -- F Bona Fide Purchase -- G Statutory Change of Position Defences -- H ConclusionThis book defines and explains the operation of the defence of change of position in Anglo-Australian law. It is a widely accepted view that the defence is a modern development, the first express recognition of which can be traced in England to the seminal decision of the House of Lords in Lipkin Gorman (a firm) v Karpnale Ltd. Commentators have accordingly tended to focus on post-Lipkin case law in discussing the defence and its many disputed features. This work takes a different stance, arguing that the defence is best understood by placing it within its broader historical and legal context. It explains that the foundations of the defence can be found in the related doctrines of estoppel by representation, the agent's defence of payment over and the law of rescission. The analysis applies crucial insights from those areas, together with the change of position authorities and broader considerations of policy and principle, to develop a rigorous model of the change of position defence. The work not only provides a clear and exhaustive examination of the defence, but demonstrates that, properly understood, the defence operates in a rational and justifiable manner within its broader private law context. In so doing, its analysis meets the oft-expressed concern than the defence may operate in an unprincipled way or by reference to 'that vague jurisprudence which is sometimes attractively styled "justice as between man and man"'Unjust enrichmentContract lawRestitutionEstoppelMistake (Law)Electronic books.Unjust enrichment.Restitution.Estoppel.Mistake (Law)340.2346.029Bant Elise1052555UtOrBLWUtOrBLWUkLoBPBOOK9910454828803321The change of position defence2483927UNINA05844nam 22009853 450 991079455180332120231208182018.01-64712-092-61-64712-091-8(CKB)4100000011961417(MiAaPQ)EBC6641360(Au-PeEL)EBL6641360(OCoLC)1256996779(EXLCZ)99410000001196141720210901d2021 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe Aesthetics of Solidarity Our Lady of Guadalupe and American Democracy /Nichole M. Flores1st ed.Washington :Georgetown University Press,2021.Baltimore, Maryland :Project MUSE©2021.1 online resource (180 pages)Moral Traditions1-64712-090-X A Political Theology of Guadalupe and Juan Diego -- Rawl's Liberal Imagination -- Nussbaum's Liberal Aesthetics -- Lifting Up the Lowly -- The Aesthetic Dimension of Solidarity."Latinx Catholics have used Our Lady of Guadalupe as a symbol in democratic campaigns ranging from the United Farm Workers movement to the Chicano movement to the movement for just immigration reform. In diverse ways, these groups use Guadalupe's symbol and narrative to make claims about justice in society's basic structures (law, policy, institutions, for example) while seeking to generate greater participation and representation in US democracy. Yet, Guadalupe is illegible within a liberal political framework that seeks to protect society's basic structures from religious encroachment by relegating religious speech, practices, and symbols to the realm of the background culture. In response to this problem, religious ethicists have argued for expansions of the liberal framework that would make religious language, arguments, and practices communities legible within a pluralistic society without capitulating to anti-democratic modes of governance that undermine pluralism. What remains unexplored is the way that the aesthetic dimensions of particular religious traditions can be engaged toward cultivating a more participatory democracy that invites substantive contributions to society's common life from religious people and communities. Instead, in conversation with political liberalism, Latinx theological aesthetics, and Catholic social thought, The Aesthetics of Solidarity examines the use of particular religious symbols to make democratic claims and generate greater participation and presence in the life of US democracy. After evaluating liberalism's capacity for constructive engagement with religion toward strengthening democratic participation, the project employs Latinx theological aesthetics and Catholic social thought to offer a constructive framework for interpreting religious symbols in the context of a religiously pluralistic and participatory democratic life"--Provided by publisher.Moral TraditionsOur Lady of Guadalupe and American DemocracyPolitical theologyUnited StateChristian sociologyCatholic churchGuadalupe, Our Lady ofSolidarityReligious aspectsSolidarityPolitical aspectsUnited StatesHispanic AmericansPolitics and governmentHispanic AmericansReligionReligion and politicsUnited StatesThéologie politique(CaQQLa)201-0036834États-Unis(CaQQLa)201-0407727Doctrine sociale de l'Église(CaQQLa)201-0023716Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe(CaQQLa)201-0132135Américains d'origine latino-américaineReligion(CaQQLa)201-0151611Religion et politique(CaQQLa)201-0029244États-Unis(CaQQLa)201-0407727SolidarityReligious aspectsfast(OCoLC)fst01125486SolidarityPolitical aspectsfast(OCoLC)fst01125485Religion and politicsfast(OCoLC)fst01093842Political theologyfast(OCoLC)fst01069899Hispanic AmericansReligionfast(OCoLC)fst00957592Hispanic AmericansPolitics and governmentfast(OCoLC)fst00957586Guadalupe, Our Lady offast(OCoLC)fst00948687Christian sociologyCatholic Churchfast(OCoLC)fst00859533United StatesfastPolitical theologyChristian sociologyCatholic church.Guadalupe, Our Lady ofSolidarityReligious aspects.SolidarityPolitical aspectsHispanic AmericansPolitics and government.Hispanic AmericansReligion.Religion and politicsThéologie politiqueDoctrine sociale de l'Église.Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe.Américains d'origine latino-américaineReligion.Religion et politiqueSolidarityReligious aspects.SolidarityPolitical aspects.Religion and politics.Political theology.Hispanic AmericansReligion.Hispanic AmericansPolitics and government.Guadalupe, Our Lady of.Christian sociologyCatholic Church.322.10973Flores Nichole M1582530Projectc Muse.MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910794551803321The Aesthetics of Solidarity3865001UNINA