02816nam 2200613Ia 450 991045392330332120200520144314.01-281-80273-597866118027380-567-13276-5(CKB)1000000000542284(EBL)437037(OCoLC)276782138(SSID)ssj0000192665(PQKBManifestationID)12024330(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000192665(PQKBWorkID)10218090(PQKB)11713736(MiAaPQ)EBC437037(Au-PeEL)EBL437037(CaPaEBR)ebr10250752(CaONFJC)MIL180273(OCoLC)893334401(EXLCZ)99100000000054228420050210d2005 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrLinguistic evidence for the pre-exilic date of the Yahwistic source[electronic resource] /Richard M. WrightLondon ;New York T&T Clark Internationalc20051 online resource (219 p.)Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament studies ;419Description based upon print version of record.0-567-04121-2 Includes bibliographical references (p. [165]-176) and index.Contents; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION; Chapter 2 MORPHOLOGY; Chapter 3 SYNTAX; Chapter 4 PHRASEOLOGY; Chapter 5 LEXEMES; Chapter 6 PERSIAN LOAN-WORDS; Chapter 7 DISPUTED 'J' SOURCE VERSES; Chapter 8 CONCLUSIONS; Bibliography; Index of ReferencesFor the past few decades a growing number of scholars have attempted to overthrow the traditional Wellhausian view that the so-called 'Yahwist' or 'J' source of the Pentateuch is the oldest of the four major sources. These scholars have argued that J was composed during the exilic or post-exilic periods of ancient Israel. Their arguments have focused on the literary, historiographic, and theological characteristics of 'J'. This book attempts to re-evaluate on linguistic grounds such efforts to place the Yahwist source in the exilic or post-exilic periods.The study employs the methodology develLibrary of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament studies ;419.J document (Biblical criticism)Hebrew languageStyleElectronic books.J document (Biblical criticism)Hebrew languageStyle.222/.1066Wright Richard M113934MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910453923303321Linguistic evidence for the pre-exilic date of the Yahwistic source2188452UNINA