05779nam 2200685 450 991045344040332120200903223051.090-272-7054-6(CKB)2550000001272796(EBL)1673651(SSID)ssj0001181710(PQKBManifestationID)12484884(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001181710(PQKBWorkID)11146167(PQKB)11540143(MiAaPQ)EBC1673651(Au-PeEL)EBL1673651(CaPaEBR)ebr10858535(CaONFJC)MIL594915(OCoLC)876835939(EXLCZ)99255000000127279620131223h20142014 uy| 0engurcnu||||||||txtccrPerspectives on phonological theory and development, in honor of Daniel A. Dinnsen /edited by Ashley W. Farris-Trimble, Simon Fraser University ; Jessica A. Barlow, San Diego State UniversityAmsterdam :John Benjamins Publishing Company,[2014]©20141 online resource (264 p.)Language acquisition and language disorders (LALD),0925-0123 ;volume 56Description based upon print version of record.90-272-5318-8 1-306-63664-7 Includes bibliographical references and index.Perspectives on Phonological Theory and Development; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Foreword and tabula gratulatoria; Tabula gratulatoria; Introduction; Introduction; References; Section 1. Representations and contrast; References; Prosodic Licensing and the development of phonological and morphological representations; Introduction; Interactions at the segmental/prosodic interface; Interactions at the morphology/syllable structure interface; Interactions at the morphology/phrasal interface; Interactions at the morphology/prosodic word interface; DiscussionAcknowledgements References; Covert contrast in the acquisition of second language phonology; Introduction; Background; Covert contrast; Allophonic splits; Methodology; Transcriptions; Acoustic analysis; Results; Group results; Individual results; Discussion; Pedagogical implications; Conclusion; Acknowledgement; References; Appendix; Target words; Section 2. Sources of individual differences in phonological acquisition; References; Sibling rivalry; Introduction; Method; Participants; Phonological samples; Phonological analyses; Phonological similarity; Results; Leo and Simon; Jane & LucyRachel & Samuel Jennika & Daniel; Similarity across dyads; Lucy compared to all children; Discussion; References; Appendix A. Basic Analysis for Leo and Simon; Appendix B. Basic Analysis for Jane and Lucy; Appendix C. Basic Analysis for Rachel and Samuel; Appendix D. Basic Analysis for Jennika and Daniel; Abstracting phonological generalizations; Introduction; Descriptive characterizations of generalization; Empirical characterizations of generalization; Methods; Participants and phonemic inventories; Treatment stimuli and protocol; Measure of phonological generalization; Data analysisReliability of coding Results; Trials and accuracy at first generalization; Differential first generalization; Trajectory of generalization; Discussion; Applied considerations; Theoretical implications; Conclusion; Author note; References; Rapid phonological coding and working memory dynamics in children with cochlear implants; Introduction; Core findings on speech and language outcomes after cochlear implantation; Large individual differences in outcome and benefit; What is a cochlear implant and how does it work?; Preimplant predictors of speech and language outcomes; Age of implantationCommunication mode: "Experience- and activity-dependent learning"Product vs. process measures; Learning and memory processes; The information processing approach to cognition; Brain-behavior relations; Domain-general cognitive factors; Executive function and cognitive control processes; Detection and discrimination vs. categorization and classification; Analysis of "The Stars" - The extraordinary CI users; Process measures of outcome and benefit; Verbal short-term and working memory capacity; Verbal rehearsal speed; Scanning of information in short-term memoryNonword repetition: Phonological decomposition and reassemblyThis paper explores superadditivity effects in natural language by considering three interrelated phenomena in Colloquial Bambara (CB). The premise of superadditivity is that although marked structures are accommodated in a system, particular structures cannot co-occur in a given domain. This arises because the simultaneous, additive violation of constraints within a domain arguably incurs an additional penalty. Thus, languages may limit the number of phonologically complex structures in a domain. We consider superadditivity in CB, which places strict limitations on the type and distribLanguage acquisition & language disorders ;volume 56.Grammar, Comparative and generalPhonologyLanguage acquisitionElectronic books.Grammar, Comparative and generalPhonology.Language acquisition.414Farris-Trimble AshleyBarlow Jessica A.Dinnsen Daniel A.MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910453440403321Perspectives on phonological theory and development, in honor of Daniel A. Dinnsen2002486UNINA