02900nam 2200709 450 991045299160332120200520144314.00-19-802732-X97866105350881-280-53508-31-282-38423-697866123842330-19-535442-7(CKB)1000000000549478(StDuBDS)AH24083769(SSID)ssj0000176178(PQKBManifestationID)11165644(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000176178(PQKBWorkID)10206233(PQKB)11500192(MiAaPQ)EBC271638(MiAaPQ)EBC4702576(Au-PeEL)EBL4702576(CaPaEBR)ebr11273637(OCoLC)816348158(EXLCZ)99100000000054947820161012h19981998 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtccrIdeology in the language of judges how judges practice law, politics, and courtroom control /Susan U. PhilipsNew York, [New York] ;Oxford, [England] :Oxford University Press,1998.©19981 online resource (288p.) Oxford Studies in Anthropological LinguisticsBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-19-511340-3 0-19-511341-1 Includes bibliographical references and index.Studying the language of judges in courtrooms, the author of this text demonstrates that they are not impartial arbiters of due process, but are influenced by their own politico-ideological stance and interpretation of the law.Philips looks at the languages of judges in the courtroom to show that, while judges see themselves as impartial agents of the constitutional right to due process, there is actually much diversity in the way that judges interract with defendants due to their interpretations of the law, their attitudes toward courtroom control, and their own political-ideological stances regarding due process. She uses courtroom transcripts, interviews, and the written law itself to show how ideological diversity is organized in legal discourse.Oxford studies in anthropological linguistics.JudgesUnited StatesJudicial processUnited StatesLawPolitical aspectsLawLanguageElectronic books.JudgesJudicial processLawPolitical aspects.LawLanguage.347.73/14Philips Susan Urmston460672MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910452991603321Ideology in the language of judges2151595UNINA