03565nam 22005172 450 991045285440332120160602124841.083-233-8492-4(CKB)2550000000109540(EBL)920831(OCoLC)818857754(UkCbUP)CR9788323384922(MiAaPQ)EBC920831(Au-PeEL)EBL920831(CaPaEBR)ebr10569617(EXLCZ)99255000000010954020140424d2010|||| uy| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierModernity and what has been lost considerations on the legacy of Leo Strauss /edited by Pawel Armada and Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz[electronic resource]First edition.Krakow :Jagiellonian University Press,2010.1 online resource (181 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 31 May 2016).83-233-2965-6 Includes bibliographical references and indexes.CONTENTS; THE QUESTION OF MODERNITY MEETS THE QUESTION OF LEO STRAUSS; WHY LEO STRAUSS? FOUR ANSWERS AND ONE CONSIDERATION CONCERNING THE USES AND DISADVANTAGESOF THE SCHOOL FOR THE PHILOSOPHICAL LIFE; LEO STRAUSS AND THE CONTEMPORARY RETURN TO POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY; PHILOSOPHY AS THE RIGHT WAY OF LIFE IN NATURAL RIGHT AND HISTORY; THE PHILOSOPHER'S ANCIENT CLOTHES: LEO STRAUSS ON PHILOSOPHY AND POETRY; LEO STRAUSS AS ERZIEHER: THE DEFENSE OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL LIFE OR THE DEFENSE OF LIFE AGAINST PHILOSOPHY?; MODERN CHALLENGES - PLATONIC RESPONSES: STRAUSS, ARENDT, VOEGELINKARL LÖWITH AND LEO STRAUSS ON MODERNITY, SECULARIZATION, AND NIHILISMREMARKS ON THE STRAUSS-KOJÈVE DIALOGUE AND ITS PRESUPPOSITIONS; CARL SCHMITT AND HIS CRITIC; POSTMODERNISM AND THE ART OF WRITING: THE IMPORTANCE OF LEO STRAUSS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY; LEO STRAUSS'S GYNAIKOLOGIA; CONTRIBUTORS; NAME INDEX; SUBJECT INDEXThe title of this volume appears to suggest that modernity is somehow devoid of something of utmost importance. Sixteen years after the death of Leo Strauss, certainly one of the most profound thinkers in the twentieth century, the model of liberal democracy has been declared victorious, not to say final and true. Due to unrestrained acceptance of such a perspective, a real tension between human beings disappears as there is only one way of being 'correct'. Having taken it into consideration, we point toward something that goes beyond the discussion about the pros and cons of liberal democracy. It would be presumptuous to believe that the current embrace of the liberal-democratic model of culture has definitely settled the question, 'How to live?' And if modernity threatens to silence this most important question, or to neglect its importance as seen by common sense, it seems all the more important to show that the contemporary answers fall short of being self-evident.Modernity & What Has Been LostCivilization, ModernPhilosophyPolitical sciencePhilosophyCivilization, ModernPhilosophy.Political sciencePhilosophy.320.092Armada PawełGórnisiewicz ArkadiuszUkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910452854403321Modernity and what has been lost2472651UNINA01451nas 22004571a 450 991013953810332120240413021357.02108-6397(CKB)958480191048(CONSER)sc-91020000-(DE-599)ZDB2198616-2(EXLCZ)9995848019104820790511c1975uuuu --- bfretxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierAnnales de la Fondation Louis de BroglieParis Conservatoire national des arts et métiers1 online resourceRefereed/Peer-reviewedPrint version: Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie. 0182-4295 (DLC)sc 91020000 (OCoLC)4952322 FONDATION LOUIS DE BROGLIE ANNALESANN. FOND. LOUIS DE BROGLIEAnn. fond. Louis BrogliePhysicsPeriodicalsPhysicsfast(OCoLC)fst01063025NatuurkundegttPeriodicals.fastPeriodicals.lcgftPhysicsPhysics.Natuurkunde.530.5Fondation Louis de Broglie.Conservatoire national des arts et métiers (France)JOURNAL9910139538103321exl_impl conversionAnnales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie801549UNINA