04315nam 22006855 450 991041614390332120250610110031.03-030-54237-810.1007/978-3-030-54237-5(CKB)4100000011384202(MiAaPQ)EBC6299454(DE-He213)978-3-030-54237-5(PPN)250217244(MiAaPQ)EBC29092802(EXLCZ)99410000001138420220200812d2020 u| 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierArbitration and Human Rights Approaches to Excluding the Annulment of Arbitral Awards and Their Compatibility with the ECHR /by Toms Krūmiņš1st ed. 2020.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2020.1 online resource (xviii, 334 pages)3-030-54236-X Includes bibliographical references.Chapter 1 - Introduction -- Chapter 2 - The ECHR: In Brief Perspective -- Chapter 3 - Arbitration and the ECHR -- Chapter 4 - Setting-Aside Proceedings – Overview, Genesis and Grounds for Annulment -- Chapter 5 - Approaches to Excluding the Annulment of Arbitral Awards – Exclusion Agreements -- Chapter 6 - Approaches to Excluding the Annulment of Arbitral Awards – Total Exclusion -- Chapter 7 - Approaches to Excluding the Annulment of Arbitral Awards and Their Compatibility with the ECHR -- Chapter 8 – Conclusion.This book presents a creative synthesis of two ostensibly disparate fields of law – arbitration and human rights. More specifically, it focuses on various legislative approaches to excluding the annulment of arbitral awards (setting-aside proceedings) at the seat of arbitration and evaluates the compatibility of such approaches with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), in particular the right to a fair trial under Article 6(1). The book first assesses the applicability and impact of the ECHR, in particular Article 6(1), on international commercial arbitration. It then analyses a number of legislative approaches to excluding setting-aside proceedings, focusing on two synergetic phenomena – exclusion agreements and the total lack of setting-aside proceedings in national arbitration law. Lastly, the book investigates to what extent the lack of setting-aside proceedings in national arbitration law may lead to a violation of arbitrating parties’ right to a fair trial under Article 6(1), and puts forward certain de lege ferenda recommendations on how to best approach the regulation of setting-aside proceedings in national arbitration law from the standpoint of compliance with the ECHR.MediationDispute resolution (Law)Conflict managementHuman rightsCivil rightsConflict of lawsConflict of lawsDispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitrationhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R22000Human Rightshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19020European Fundamental Rights and Freedomshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R20010Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R14002Mediation.Dispute resolution (Law)Conflict management.Human rights.Civil rights.Conflict of laws.Conflict of laws.Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration.Human Rights.European Fundamental Rights and Freedoms.Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law .341.481Krūmiņš Tomsauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut883065MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910416143903321Arbitration and Human Rights1972532UNINA