03675oam 2200625 450 991013142780332120221206104735.088-6705-364-710.4000/books.ledizioni.369(CKB)3710000000435028(SSID)ssj0001546214(PQKBManifestationID)16134302(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001546214(PQKBWorkID)12280631(PQKB)11633675(FrMaCLE)OB-ledizioni-369(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/41857(PPN)197596061(EXLCZ)99371000000043502820160829d2012 uy 0enguuuu#---uuuuutxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe battle of Konotop 1659 exploring alternatives in East European history /Oleg Rumyantsev and Giovanna Brogi Bercoff (editors)Ledizioni2012Milano :Ledizioni,2012.1 online resource (126 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Di/segni The Battle of Konotop 1659Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: MonographPrint version: 8867050508 Includes bibliographical references and index.The battle that took place near Konotop in late June 1659 was a continuation of the Muscovite-Cossack war, which began in the fall of 1658, soon after the signing of the Union of Hadiach. Cossack and Tatar detachments trapped a significant portion of the Muscovite army, leading to enormous Russian losses. The unprecedented defeat of the previously invincible forces caused panic in Russia, but the Muscovites’ capacity to turn defeat into political victory, and the fratricidal struggle in Ukraine, known as the “Ruin”, left most of the Cossack lands on the Right Bank of the Dnieper uninhabitable. Konotop is a classic example of a battle won, but a war lost. ariusz Robert Drozdowski, Ksenia Konstantynenko, Piotr Kroll, Serhii Plokhy, Oleg Rumyantsev, Natalia Yakovenko and Tatjana Yakovleva-Tairova, the authors of this collection, hail from Poland, Italy, USA, Ukraine and Russia. They consider the military, political, social, and cultural context of the battle and also investigate its treatment in historical and literary writings from the early modern era to the present. They approach their topic from the point of view of various disciplines, traditions, and schools of thought. Their essays expand our understanding of the battle, its outcome and legacy in unexpected and historiographically productive ways.Battle of Konotop 1659Konotop, Battle of, Konotop, Sums§ka oblast§, Ukraine, 1659HistoriographyKonotop, Battle of, Konotop, Sums§ka oblast§, Ukraine, 1659Regions & Countries - EuropeHILCCHistory & ArchaeologyHILCCRussia & Former Soviet RepublicsHILCCUkraineHistory, Military17th centuryKonotop, Battle of, Konotop, Sums§ka oblast§, Ukraine, 1659HistoriographyKonotop, Battle of, Konotop, Sums§ka oblast§, Ukraine, 1659Regions & Countries - EuropeHistory & ArchaeologyRussia & Former Soviet RepublicsGiovanna Brogi Bercoffauth223942Rumjancev Oleg EvgenovicBrogi Bercoff GiovannaPQKBUkMaJRUBOOK9910131427803321The battle of Konotop 16593360640UNINA03654nam 22005415 450 991040999180332120250609110814.03-030-38625-210.1007/978-3-030-38625-2(CKB)4100000011320994(MiAaPQ)EBC6236218(DE-He213)978-3-030-38625-2(PPN)267508026(MiAaPQ)EBC6236119(EXLCZ)99410000001132099420200624d2020 u| 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe Significance of Aspect Perception Bringing the Phenomenal World into View /by Avner Baz1st ed. 2020.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2020.1 online resource (208 pages)Nordic Wittgenstein Studies,2520-1522 ;53-030-38624-4 Chapter 1. What’s the Point of Seeing Aspects? -- Chapter 2. On Learning from Wittgenstein; or What does it Take to See the Grammar of Seeing Aspects? -- Chapter 3. Aspect Perception and Philosophical Difficulty -- Chapter 4. The Sound of Bedrock: Lines of Grammar between Kant, Wittgenstein, and Cavell -- Chapter 5. Aspects of Perception -- Chapter 6. Motivational Indeterminacy -- Chapter 7. Wittgenstein and the Difficulty of What Normally Goes Without Saying -- Chapter 8. Bringing the Phenomenal World into View.In this volume, Baz offers a wide-ranging discussion of Wittgenstein’s remarks on aspect-perception, with special focus on Wittgenstein’s method. Baz starts out with an interpretation of Wittgenstein’s remarks on aspects and continues with attempts to characterize and defend Wittgenstein’s approach to the understanding and dissolution of philosophical difficulties. Baz ends with attempts to articulate—under the inspiration of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology—certain dissatisfactions, both with Wittgenstein’s remarks on aspect perception, and with his philosophical approach more generally. On the way, Baz explores connections between Wittgenstein’s remarks on aspects and Kant’s aesthetics. He examines ways in which the remarks on aspects may be brought to bear on contemporary philosophical work on perception. He discusses some of the implications of Wittgenstein’s work on aspect perception for issues in moral philosophy and the philosophy of action. Wittgenstein said the problem of aspect perception was as hard as granite, and no one is a more capable, persistent and imaginative stonecutter than Baz. Using insights from Merleau-Ponty’s work, he shows how the philosophical significance of what is involved in “seeing something as something” is still being widely misunderstood and underappreciated. These essays stand out by their depth and honesty, and raise new questions that anyone working in the area will have to address. – Martin Gustafsson, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.Nordic Wittgenstein Studies,2520-1522 ;5PhenomenologyAestheticsPhenomenologyAestheticsPhenomenology.Aesthetics.Phenomenology.Aesthetics.142.7121.34Baz Avnerauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut972172MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910409991803321The Significance of Aspect Perception2210317UNINA