01484nam--2200433---450-99000282008020331620060928093855.0960-814508-2 (set)960-814506-6 (v. 1).960-814507-4 (v. 2)000282008USA01000282008(ALEPH)000282008USA0100028200820060928d2001----km-y0itay50------bamulGRa---||||001yyEpeirotika kai makedonika meletemataIoulias bokotopoulouStudies on Epirus and MacedoniaIoulias VokotopoulouAthenaiHe en Athenais Archaiologike Hetaireia20012 v. (XXXIII-817 p. compless.)ill.29 cmBibliotheke tes en Athenais Archaiologikes Hetaireias<<The>> archaeological society at Athens library1982001Bibliotheke tes en Athenais Archaiologikes Hetaireias<<The>> archaeological society at Athens library1982001001-------2001EpiroStudiMacedoniaStudi949.53949.56BOKOTOPOULOU,Ioulias594905ITsalbcISBD990002820080203316I T EPI 2/16218 DBCI TI T EPI 2/26219 DBCI TBKDBCDBC9020060928USA010938Epeirotika kai makedonika meletemata994142UNISA01033nam2-2200349---450-99000606117020331620150722114016.03-11-017997-2000606117USA01000606117(ALEPH)000606117USA0100060611720051107-2006----m||y0itay0103----baengDEy|||z|||001yy30: Split intransitivity in Italianby Delia BentleyBerlinNew YorkMouton de Gruyter2006XIV, 455 p.23 cm0010002682732001Empirical approaches to language typologyLingueItaliaSintassi455BENTLEY,Delia175863IT990006061170203316IV.2. 262910916 L.G.IV.2.377805BKUMAPASSARO9020150722USA011137PASSARO9020150722USA01114030: Split intransitivity in Italian1102682UNISA02977nam 2200469 450 991052259310332120221128142550.01-911507-19-2(CKB)5860000000000209(NjHacI)995860000000000209(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/82265(PPN)268257930(EXLCZ)99586000000000020920220921d2022 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierAchieving Access to Justice in a Business and Human Rights Context. An Assessment of Litigation and Regulatory Responses in European Civil-Law Countries /Virginie RouasLondon2022London :University of London Press,2022.1 online resource (xxx, 390 pages)OBServing LawIncludes index.1-911507-18-4 Part I. Setting the scene: access to justice and corporate accountability in Europe; 1. Introduction. -- 2. Corporate accountability and access to justice in international and European legal frameworks. --3. The rise of transnational litigation against multinational enterprises. -- Part II. Suing multinational enterprises in Europe: comparing national experiences in civil law jurisdictions; 4. Civil litigation against multinational enterprises in France and the Netherlands. -- 5. Criminal litigation against multinational enterprises in France and the Netherlands. -- 6. Holding multinational enterprises liable in France and the Netherlands. -- Part III. Future pathways for access to justice in business and human rights; 7. Achieving access to justice in Europe through mandatory due diligence legislation. -- 8. Achieving access to justice through an international treaty on business and human rights. -- 9. ConclusionsAchieving Access to Justice in a Business and Human Rights Context explores the interplay between access to justice and business and human rights- a growing area of international human rights law- in European civil-law countries.Achieving Access to Justice in a Business and Human Rights ContextHuman rightsInternational business enterprisesSocial aspectsAccess to justice, corporate accountability, Europe, France, Netherlands, human rights, business and human rights, human rights due diligence, civil-law countries, European law, law, MNE, multi-national enterprises, abuse, big business, oil spillHuman rights.International business enterprisesSocial aspects.341.48094Rouas Virginie1260633NjHacINjHaclBOOK9910522593103321Achieving Access to Justice in a Business and Human Rights Context2921664UNINA03969 am 22007213u 450 991013151920332120230621140721.09789616842488(ebook)(CKB)3710000000499600(SSID)ssj0001680315(PQKBManifestationID)16496355(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001680315(PQKBWorkID)15028430(PQKB)10615364(WaSeSS)IndRDA00057835(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/26774(EXLCZ)99371000000049960020160829d2015 uy |engurm|#---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierEvidence in civil law France /Martin OudinInstitute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor2015Slovenia :Institute for Local Self Government and Public Procurement Maribor,20151 online resource (ii, 55 pages)Law & SocietyBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: MonographIncludes bibliographical references.The French Law of evidence is at the crossroad between procedural law and civil law. As part of the procedural law, it is governed by general principles set out by the Code de procédure civile, such as the contradictory principle, the principle of public hearing or the free disposition principle, which means that the parties define the framework of the proceeding and that the judge cannot base his decision on facts that were not put forward by the parties themselves. It is also the Code de procédure civile that organises the respective roles of the judge and the parties for the taking of evidence: since 1976, it imposes a – rather complex – balance between adversarial and inquisitorial principles. Other general principles were set by case law, e.g. the principle that no one can pre-constitute evidence in his own favour or the principle of fair evidence. On the other hand, more substantive rules are to be found in the Code civil. These rules mix two systems, the system of the preuve morale, applicable in some specific litigation, and the system of the preuve légale, which is clearly dominant in civil litigation. In the first system, evidence is in principle free, which means not only that any mode of proof is admissible, but also that assessment of evidence by the judges is free. In the second one, only determined means of evidence are admissible and their probative force is often set out by law. A majority of evidence rules derive more or less directly from this summa divisio. In fact, the predominance of the preuve légale system has made the French system of evidence rather rigid, in particular regarding the exaggerated importance of written evidence.Law & society.Law - Europe, except U.KHILCCLaw - Non-U.SHILCCLaw, Politics & GovernmentHILCCinquisitorial principleburden of proofwritten evidencefree disposition principleadversarial principleiura novit curiatestimonial evidenceoralityfair evidencecontradictory principlestandard of proofCivil procedureCourt of Cassation (France)FranceLaw of FranceLetters rogatoryLexisNexisNapoleonic CodeRelevance (law)Law - Europe, except U.K.Law - Non-U.S.Law, Politics & GovernmentOudin Martin977415PQKBUkMaJRU9910131519203321Evidence in civil law2226520UNINA02322nam 2200541zu 450 991037589540332120210807005125.01-4503-1691-3(CKB)3780000000084551(SSID)ssj0001138088(PQKBManifestationID)11669735(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001138088(PQKBWorkID)11127703(PQKB)11228835(WaSeSS)IndRDA00013311(Association for Computing Machinery)10.1145/2424321(EXLCZ)99378000000008455120160829d2012 uy engur|||||||||||txtccr20th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2012) : November 6-9, 2012 - Redondo Beach, California[Place of publication not identified]ACM20121 online resource (642 pages)ACM ConferencesBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: MonographACM Conferences20th Association for Computing Machinery Special Interest Group on Spatial Information International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2012) :November 6-9, 2012 - Redondo Beach, CaliforniaProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information SystemsSIGSPATIAL'12 International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (formerly known as GIS), Redondo Beach, CA, USA - November 07 - 09, 2012GeographyHILCCEarth & Environmental SciencesHILCCGeography-GeneralHILCCGeographyEarth & Environmental SciencesGeography-GeneralCruz Isabel973989Knoblock CraigKröger PeerCruz IsabelAssociation for Computing Machinery-Digital Library.PQKBBOOK991037589540332120th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2012) : November 6-9, 2012 - Redondo Beach, California2216951UNINA