04356nam 22006015 450 991036991080332120240424211952.03-658-25199-910.1007/978-3-658-25199-4(CKB)4100000008103854(MiAaPQ)EBC5776243(DE-He213)978-3-658-25199-4(PPN)25945978X(EXLCZ)99410000000810385420190502d2020 u| 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe Nagorno-Karabakh deadlock[electronic resource] Insights from successful conflict settlements /edited by Azer Babayev, Bruno Schoch, Hans-Joachim Spanger1st ed. 2020.Wiesbaden :Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden :Imprint: Springer VS,2020.1 online resource (x, 320 pages) illustrationsStudien des Leibniz-Instituts Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung,2662-35443-658-25198-0 Part I Nagorno-Karabakh and ethno-territorial conflict settlement -- Part II Case studies of ethno-territorial conflict settlement: Åland, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, South Tyrol, Trieste, Cyprus, Northern Ireland, Quebec -- Part III Results and conclusions: A way out for Nagorno-Karabakh.The book examines all relevant models which have been employed in settling ethno-territorial conflicts since the time of the League of Nations. Eight of these models have been studied in-depth. The aim of this analysis is to gain expertise and insights that could prove relevant to resolving the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh. This potential is evaluated in the closing chapters of the volume where novel ideas on how to apply the lessons of these cases to the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh are presented. This conflict carries many features typical of ethno-territorial conflicts in present and past times: it is neither unique, nor does its settlement depend on others than the parties to the conflict. Rather it is – as in all other cases – entrenched historical narratives and enemy images which lead to zero-sum calculations and can conceivably only be overcome in a gradual process. Content Part I Nagorno-Karabakh and ethno-territorial conflict settlement Part II Case studies of ethno-territorial conflict settlement: Åland, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, South Tyrol, Trieste, Cyprus, Northern Ireland, Quebec. Part III Results and conclusions: A way out for Nagorno-Karabakh The Editors Dr Azer Babayev is Assistant Professor of Political Science at ADA University, Baku. Dr Bruno Schoch is Associated Researcher at PRIF (Peace Research Institute Frankfurt), Frankfurt/Main. Dr Hans-Joachim Spanger is Head of the Dissemination Division at PRIF (Peace Research Institute Frankfurt), Frankfurt/Main.Studien des Leibniz-Instituts Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung,2662-3544PeaceComparative politicsPeace Studieshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/912070Conflict Studieshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/912060Comparative Politicshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911040Russian and Post-Soviet Politicshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911170European Politicshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911130RussiaPolitics and governmentEuropePolitics and governmentPeace.Comparative politics.Peace Studies.Conflict Studies.Comparative Politics.Russian and Post-Soviet Politics.European Politics.303.69Babayev Azeredthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtSchoch Brunoedthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtSpanger Hans-Joachimedthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtBOOK9910369910803321The Nagorno-Karabakh deadlock1965925UNINA