04699nam 22006375 450 991033787280332120200701071546.03-030-13300-110.1007/978-3-030-13300-9(CKB)4100000008493438(DE-He213)978-3-030-13300-9(MiAaPQ)EBC5795940(PPN)257359206(EXLCZ)99410000000849343820190620d2019 u| 0engurnn|008mamaatxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierPracticing the Correspondence Principle in the Old Quantum Theory A Transformation through Implementation /by Martin Jähnert1st ed. 2019.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2019.1 online resource (XIII, 293 p. 21 illus.) Archimedes, New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology,1385-0180 ;563-030-13299-4 1. Introduction -- 2. The Correspondence Principle in Copenhagen 1913–1923: Origin, Formulation and Consolidation -- 3. The Correspondence Principle in the Quantum Network 1918–1926 -- 4. Using the Magic Wand: Sommerfeld, Multiplet Intensities and the Correspondence Principle -- 5. Fertilizer on a Sandy Acreage: Franck, Hund and the Ramsauer Effect -- 6. That I Cannot Conceive of After the Results of Your Dissertation: Fritz Reiche and the F-sum Rule -- 7. Copenhagen Reactions: The Intensity Problem in Copenhagen, 1924–1925 -- 8. Conclusion -- A. Applications of the Correspondence Principle 1918–1928 -- Archives -- Bibliography.This book presents a history of the correspondence principle from a new perspective. The author provides a unique exploration of the relation between the practice of theory and conceptual development in physics. In the process, he argues for a new understanding of the history of the old quantum theory and the emergence of quantum mechanics. The analysis looks at how the correspondence principle was disseminated and how the principle was applied as a research tool during the 1920s. It provides new insights into the interaction between theoretical tools and scientific problems and shows that the use of this theoretical tool changed the tool itself in a process of transformation through implementation. This process, the author claims, was responsible for the conceptual development of the correspondence principle. This monograph connects to the vast literature in the history of science, which analyzed theoretical practices as based on tacit knowledge, skills, and calculation techniques. It contributes to the historical understanding of quantum physics and the emergence of quantum mechanics. Studying how physicists used a set of tools to solve problems, the author spells out the ‟skillful guessing” that went into the making of quantum theoretical arguments and argues that the integration and implementation of technical resources was a central driving force for the conceptual and theoretical transformation in the old quantum theory.Archimedes, New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology,1385-0180 ;56PhysicsHistoryPhilosophy and scienceIntellectual life—HistoryCivilization—HistoryHistory and Philosophical Foundations of Physicshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/P29000History of Sciencehttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/731000Philosophy of Sciencehttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E34000Intellectual Studieshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/729000Cultural Historyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/723000Physics.History.Philosophy and science.Intellectual life—History.Civilization—History.History and Philosophical Foundations of Physics.History of Science.Philosophy of Science.Intellectual Studies.Cultural History.530.01530.12Jähnert Martinauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1064947BOOK9910337872803321Practicing the Correspondence Principle in the Old Quantum Theory2541885UNINA